Teams

LA-LLW-The Dream Team-Lisa Klingenberg

2022 SoCal Doubles Weekday - LA · LA - Women 4.0 WD

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-28vs LA - Century CityWon 10
W#3 DoublesLupe Lopez / Danelle Geller vs Claire Weis / Arianne Rudes6-0, 6-1
2022-10-03vs LA - Century CityWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeslie Gilbert-Lurie / Lupe Lopez vs Mary Kayne / Alexia Monti3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-26vs LA - VermonstersLost 01
L#3 DoublesLeslie Gilbert-Lurie / Lupe Lopez vs Gloria Ziperovich / Sylvia DSouza7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-19vs LA - MountainGateWon 10
W#3 DoublesLupe Lopez / Leslie Gilbert-Lurie vs Yolanda Zackler / Heidi Shepherd6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Danelle Geller
published 4
3.93
Lisa Klingenberg
published
3.90
Kelly Nielson
published 4.5
3.90
Stacie Smiley
published 4.5
3.83
Leah Lavin
published
3.72
Krisha Garvey
published
3.69
Julie Woolenberg
published
3.63
Lupe Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.61
Nicola Kerner
published
3.44
3.40
Kimberly Branscome
published 3.5
Maureen Rowles
published
Wendy Marcus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Klingenberg + Danelle Geller21364% games+3.6% vs expected
Kelly Nielson + Stacie Smiley562358% games+2.4% vs expected
Julie Woolenberg + Kimberly Branscome2446% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danelle Geller
28W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
4.01
Lisa Klingenberg
25W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
4.5
Kelly Nielson
67W–30L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.90
4.5
Stacie Smiley
81W–36L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.90
Leah Lavin
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Krisha Garvey
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Julie Woolenberg
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Lupe Lopez
149W–105L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Nicola Kerner
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
Leslie Gilbert-Lurie
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
3.5
Kimberly Branscome
31W–47L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
Maureen Rowles
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Marcus
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.