Teams

Spin Doctors - AVSP

2021 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-07-27vs DRAKE - Belmont CCWon 10
W#3 DoublesPaula Garrison / Caroline Mia Lee vs Christy Bixler / Kim Hovda6-0, 6-0
2021-07-22vs RYAN - BROADLANDSWon 10
W#1 DoublesDevika Eddula / Elizabeth Fisher vs Janann Mercker / Stephanie Place6-3, 6-3
2021-07-20vs Glam Slam - A. FARMSSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMindi Moshides vs Ann Allen7-5, 3-3
L#2 DoublesPaula Garrison / Karen Sullivan vs Heather Iasso / Kathy Morehouse2-6, 3-6
2021-07-13vs PLOFCHAN -FARMSWon 10
W#2 DoublesDevika Eddula / Lisa Furgal vs Julie Copty / Celeste Linthicum6-4, 6-4
2021-07-08vs PLOFCHAN -FARMSWon 10
W#3 DoublesMindi Moshides / Elizabeth Fisher vs Haida McGovern / Angela Tomaszewski6-1, 6-2
2021-07-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesPaula Garrison / Karen Sullivan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesPaula Garrison vs Kimberly Sysak6-2, 6-2
2021-06-29Split 11
L#1 DoublesJill Holloman / Devika Eddula vs Kathy Morehouse / Christa Williams3-6, 5-4
W#1 SinglesMindi Moshides vs Anne Walker6-3, 7-5
2021-06-24vs DRAKE - Belmont CCWon 10
W#3 DoublesDevika Eddula / Shannon Grinstead vs Shannon Pettit / Elizabeth Messner6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-06-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesDevika Eddula / Lisa Furgal vs Lu Ryan / Doreen Varblow6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jill Holloman
published 4
3.50
Caroline Mia Lee
published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Furgal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Paula Garrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Devika Eddula
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Mindi Moshides
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Stacie Kotter
published
3.10
Christine Feit
published 3.5
2.90
Niki Friedman
published
Tina Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Mia Lee + Jill Holloman14660% games+6.0% vs expected
Lisa Furgal + Devika Eddula9556% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jill Holloman
155W–54L career · no lines in 2021
<1%68%32%
3.94
3.5
Caroline Mia Lee
46W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.50
3.5
Lisa Furgal
204W–131L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Paula Garrison
115W–102L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Devika Eddula
85W–70L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Mindi Moshides
105W–104L career · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.16
Stacie Kotter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Christine Feit
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.10
Niki Friedman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
2.90
Tina Woods
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.