Teams

Washington Aces

2024 One Doubles-Winter · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Washington / Kristi Gonzalez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-20vs StruebyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristi Gonzalez / Uyen Lee vs Lee Ann Strueby / Hwayoung Srein6-2, 7-5
2024-04-13vs Waldman-Nice AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Fossum / Mollie Gosselin vs Megan Arriola / Leslie Waldman7-5, 6-3
2024-03-29vs SWW-MonsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Fossum / Diane Murray vs Lana Lane / Julie Monson3-6, 3-6
2024-03-14vs Cadiz/Tan-Sets in the CityLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristi Gonzalez / Tiffany Washington vs Mary Sheryll Tan / Jennifer Ivester6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-02-20vs Le 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Washington / Mollie Gosselin vs Adrianne Severns / Jullie Seeley6-3, 6-4
2024-02-15vs O'Halloran/McLaughlinLost 01
L#1 DoublesUyen Lee / Mollie Gosselin vs HA NGUYEN / Diana Chan3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Uyen Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Diane Murray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Mollie Gosselin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Karen Fossum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Kristi Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Tiffany Washington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Fossum + Uyen Lee4169% games+13.2% vs expected
Diane Murray + Uyen Lee8164% games+7.0% vs expected
Diane Murray + Tiffany Washington3261% games+4.5% vs expected
Karen Fossum + Tiffany Washington10656% games+4.1% vs expected
Mollie Gosselin + Uyen Lee6357% games+1.9% vs expected
Diane Murray + Kristi Gonzalez7165% games+1.7% vs expected
Kristi Gonzalez + Tiffany Washington321756% games+1.2% vs expected
Karen Fossum + Kristi Gonzalez281856% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Uyen Lee
168W–85L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Diane Murray
138W–53L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Mollie Gosselin
59W–72L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Karen Fossum
187W–175L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Kristi Gonzalez
146W–111L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Tiffany Washington
108W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.