Teams

Mask-a-raiders 6.0 (40+)

2021 Howard-Columbia Mixed 40 & Over · Howard Columbia Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-30vs Kim Kardahsiung (40+)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Laabs / Sean Alewine vs Karen Jones / Michael Vanderputten3-6, 1-6
2021-08-19Won 20
W#1 DoublesSean Alewine / Yngrid Sierra vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Flynn / Ethan Stryker vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-18vs Munshell 6.0 (40+)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesYngrid Sierra / Samit Verma vs BHUPAL REDDY THOTI REDDY / Kathleen Stevens7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrenda Poore / Sean Alewine vs Maurilio Sanches / Maria Cristina Sanchez6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2021-07-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesSean Alewine / Brenda Poore vs Todd Snyder / Risa Snyder3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-21vs Surfing The Net 6.0 (40+)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrenda Poore / Sean Alewine vs Katie Tetrault / Christopher Tetrault4-6, 1-6
2021-06-27vs KRo-Na (40+)Split 11
L#1 DoublesEthan Stryker / Amy Flynn vs Brenda Kaechele / Johnny Yataco3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Altman / Brenda Poore vs Christian Lee / Anne Schaefer7-5, 6-1
2021-06-23vs Mixed Nuts (40+)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMichael Altman / Brenda Poore vs Lisa Greenlee / Mark Greenlee6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSean Alewine / Yngrid Sierra vs Kristin Ostlie / Jim Hannan6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Sean Alewine
published
3.33
Ethan Stryker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Laura Laabs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Amy Flynn
published 3.5
3.25
Brenda Poore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.12
Yngrid Sierra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Karen Altman
published
2.97
Michael Altman
published
Samit Verma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ethan Stryker + Brenda Poore8648% games−7.9% vs expected
Yngrid Sierra + Ethan Stryker4357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sean Alewine
29W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Ethan Stryker
106W–129L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Laura Laabs
177W–206L career · 1 line in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy Flynn
no matches on record · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Brenda Poore
228W–199L career · 8 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Yngrid Sierra
165W–232L career · 6 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
Karen Altman
10W–22L career · no lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.09
Michael Altman
18W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
2.97
Samit Verma
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.