Teams

Rackettes/GCC

2024 Fall 18 & Over-Women-UPTA · 2.5 Women FF

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-18vs Rally Rabbits/KrocLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Webb / Laura Lane Louie vs Meg Riley / Brooks Ferguson6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJessica Siler vs Miller Howard4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLacey Morgan / Allison Ko vs Heather Ware / Sarah DAndrea6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-22vs UPTA18FF/Doyle/BrookstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Webb / Teresa Webster vs Janeen Doyle / Kelley Golden6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJessica Siler vs Ashley Popham6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Lane Louie / Sarah Schipper vs Toni Sharp / Betsy Crumley6-4, 7-5
2024-11-15vs RiverwalkLost 12
L#1 DoublesHolly Sellers / Lauren Barber vs Meg Powers / Alyson Barrick4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJessica Siler vs Olga Paz2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Boyd / Elizabeth Rasor vs Jessica McMullen / Heather Warren2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-11-01vs Thornblade SlagelWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Barber / Catherine Webb vs Collins Reingardt / Ashley Slagel6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Rasor / Mary Gossage vs Rachael Benson / Amy Kimbell6-4, 6-3
2024-10-25vs UPTA18A/Manning/SouthsideLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Lane Louie / Mary Gossage vs Anne Henry / Maryn Canniff3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Schipper vs Shellie Corley0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAshley Boyd / Elizabeth Rasor vs Lora Pfohl / Melissa Studebaker7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLacey Morgan / Allison Ko vs Laura Halliday / Melissa Hucks7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesHolly Sellers vs Diane Bright6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTeresa Webster / Blythe Hughes vs Shannon Wydman / Ashley Hill6-3, 6-0
2024-10-11vs GCC/SeaverWon 21
W#1 DoublesHolly Sellers / Lauren Barber vs Kristen McLean / Jennifer Coleman6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSarah Schipper vs Victoria Robinson2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLacey Morgan / Ashley Boyd vs Michelle Seaver / Caroline Giguere5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women FF have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Catherine Webb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Lauren Barber
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.60
Holly Sellers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.58
Jessica Siler
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.36
Laura Lane Louie
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Blythe Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.20
Sarah Schipper
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.05
Teresa Webster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.78
Lacey Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Rasor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Gossage
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Sellers + Lauren Barber4355% games+7.3% vs expected
Lauren Barber + Jessica Siler5061% gamesnot enough data
Holly Sellers + Jessica Siler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Catherine Webb
24W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
Lauren Barber
15W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
Holly Sellers
32W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%23%77%
2.60
Jessica Siler
21W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
2.58
Laura Lane Louie
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%85%15%
2.36
3
Blythe Hughes
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
96%4%<1%
2.25
Sarah Schipper
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.20
Teresa Webster
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Lacey Morgan
1W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.78
Elizabeth Rasor
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Gossage
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.