Teams

BM BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs CCC GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesKevin Fuchs / Ian Brown vs Jon Leonard / Steve Paris2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGregory Gleason vs Ward Cerny3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Cimbura / John Penaligon vs Jake Killgore / Kent Bassett1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Malone / Damian Hopper vs Ben Volok / Garry Byers1-6, 3-6
2026-07-06vs BCST BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesMatt Feldman / Kevin Fuchs vs Roger Williams / Paul Reisbeck6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDaniel Armstrong vs Nate Phillips6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPeter Malone / Gregory Gleason vs James Barwick / Scott Johnston6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Cimbura / Damian Hopper vs Mark Brown / John Lange1-6, 0-6
2026-06-29vs SS-HP NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesKevin Fuchs / Jeffrey Moxon vs Bret Dolph / Rob Brine6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatt Feldman / Kiley Mack vs Caleb Newquist / Mark Imrie6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDamian Hopper / John Penaligon vs Alfonso Porras / Gary Horsley3-6, 2-6
2026-06-22vs GR ORANGELost 04
L#1 DoublesJohn Cimbura / Kiley Mack vs Benjamin Jennings / Jason Urban4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMatt Feldman vs Jeffery Conaway2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGary Farmar / Peter Malone vs Sam Ferando / Jacob Godber3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Penaligon / Gregory Gleason vs Ryan Kellogg / TJ Green0-6, 4-6
2026-06-15vs KC-CC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Moxon / Daniel Armstrong vs Lance Willoughby / Lin Eshleman6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKiley Mack / John Cimbura vs Alan Larson / Jim Riley7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGary Farmar / Damian Hopper vs Cordell BaanHofman / Tim Williams4-6, 1-6
2026-06-09vs KC-RH REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Moxon / Kevin Fuchs vs Mark Garcia / Andy Stephan6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesGregory Gleason vs Erik Pigmans6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatt Feldman / Ian Brown vs Danny Coker / Roger Torres6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Malone / Gary Farmar vs Jason Bolinski / Matthew Fagan0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-06-08vs LEBTC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Moxon / Kevin Fuchs vs Michael Barbalas / Dane Embury7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesGregory Gleason vs David Kim1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesIan Brown / Kiley Mack vs Aaron Rottman / Mike DeSimone2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGary Farmar / John Penaligon vs Larry Sevit / Mark Murphy6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Daniel Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.93
Jeffrey Moxon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Matt Feldman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Gary Farmar
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.79
John Cimbura
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Kevin Fuchs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Kiley Mack
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Peter Malone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Gregory Gleason
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.51
John Penaligon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.10
Damian Hopper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Moxon + Kevin Fuchs10654% games+8.9% vs expected
Gary Farmar + Peter Malone3545% games−3.3% vs expected
John Penaligon + Gary Farmar314 matchesnot enough data
John Penaligon + Peter Malone314 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Fuchs + Peter Malone134 matchesnot enough data
Gary Farmar + Damian Hopper033 matchesnot enough data
Kiley Mack + John Cimbura123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daniel Armstrong
10W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jeffrey Moxon
17W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Matt Feldman
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Gary Farmar
9W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
John Cimbura
4W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Kevin Fuchs
14W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Kiley Mack
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Peter Malone
12W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Gregory Gleason
11W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
John Penaligon
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Damian Hopper
1W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.