Teams

NJ ORANGE

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-25vs BRMST BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesShawna Ramona / EzraLloyd Alvarico vs Jill Bouck / Rich Beaver6-2, 6-1
2023-06-23vs BRMST BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesThomas DelaFuente / Carrie Poulsen vs Ann Ipsen / David Ipsen6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSarah Weill / Brad Nash vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Scott Lilleston6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-06-18vs MEA GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Weill / Brad Nash vs Jinfang Li / Sean Kracklauer6-1, 6-4
2023-06-11vs RCC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesShawna Ramona / EzraLloyd Alvarico vs Conrad Johnson / Anne Elliott6-4, 6-4
2023-05-28vs MEA GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarrie Poulsen / EzraLloyd Alvarico vs Teri Jean Fry / Sean Kracklauer6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Weill / Brad Nash vs William Fry / Jinfang Li6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-21vs RCC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesEzraLloyd Alvarico / Carrie Poulsen vs Conrad Johnson / Cheryl Suss6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Thomas DelaFuente
published
3.82
EzraLloyd Alvarico
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.81
Janphen Jaktupat
published
3.34
Carrie Poulsen
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.23
Brad Nash
published 3.5
3.04
Sarah Weill
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Kelly Ruybal
published
Kris Kirby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Weill + EzraLloyd Alvarico6071% games+20.8% vs expected
Thomas DelaFuente + Carrie Poulsen5458% games+5.7% vs expected
Janphen Jaktupat + EzraLloyd Alvarico4160% games+5.7% vs expected
Carrie Poulsen + EzraLloyd Alvarico303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas DelaFuente
32W–28L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
EzraLloyd Alvarico
146W–43L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
Janphen Jaktupat
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Carrie Poulsen
163W–45L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Brad Nash
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Sarah Weill
140W–91L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kelly Ruybal
18W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kris Kirby
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.