Catt/40s/3.0/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 40 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

Schedule

Flight standings6 teams · Cov Mixed 40 & Over

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Catt/40s/3.0/PAC	10	0	29	1	7	159
2Parvizian/40s/3.0/SC	7	3	18	12	27	249
3Miller/3.0/40s/FAC	4	6	14	16	33	260
4Guma/40s/3.0/BC	4	6	11	19	40	313
5Klocek/40s/3.0/PAC	3	7	10	20	45	323
6Griffin/40s/3.0/NC	2	8	8	22	45	314

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17

Ann Boushie

usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3

3.10

Crissy Green

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3

3.02

Laura Bonanno

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

2.96

Molly Burns

usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published —

2.87

JP Love

usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.83

Amy St. Romain

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3

2.81

Erik Ernst

usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3

—

Jason Catt

usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published —

—

Jason Ortis

usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Jay St. Romain

usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published —

—

Joelle Cuevas

usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published —

—

Mark Lucas

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published —

—

Rebecca Sandoz

usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published —

—

Scott Cuevas

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Travis Motichek

usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Boushie + Jason Catt	7–0	66% games	not enough data
Rebecca Sandoz + Joelle Cuevas	2–3	46% games	not enough data
Scott Cuevas + Jason Catt	4–1	61% games	not enough data
Rebecca Sandoz + Scott Cuevas	3–0	3 matches	not enough data
Rebecca Sandoz + Amy St. Romain	2–1	3 matches	not enough data
JP Love + Laura Bonanno	2–1	3 matches	not enough data
JP Love + Travis Motichek	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Joelle Cuevas + Jay St. Romain	3–0	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ann Boushie

52W–22L career · 35 lines in 2026

<1%9%91%

3.17

Crissy Green

30W–11L career · 26 lines in 2026

<1%22%78%

3.10

—

Laura Bonanno

26W–18L career · 18 lines in 2026

<1%45%55%

3.02

—

Molly Burns

40W–22L career · 21 lines in 2026

<1%63%37%

2.96

JP Love

16W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%85%15%

2.87

Amy St. Romain

16W–13L career · 18 lines in 2026

1%90%10%

2.83

Erik Ernst

9W–7L career · 13 lines in 2026

1%92%7%

2.81

—

Jason Catt

38W–17L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jason Ortis

16W–34L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jay St. Romain

14W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Joelle Cuevas

34W–34L career · 28 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Mark Lucas

17W–12L career · 12 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Rebecca Sandoz

37W–21L career · 23 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Scott Cuevas

28W–20L career · 26 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Travis Motichek

17W–29L career · 19 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.