Teams

Team Maier

2023 Calvert Mixed 18 & Over · Calvert Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Maier / Greg Leihy vs Jeffrey Ocker / Maria Birnkammer4-6, 1-6
2023-05-19vs Team PhungLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Maier / Greg Leihy vs Luis Lozano / Maria Birnkammer7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-18vs Team PhungWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Todd Cervini vs Clayton Coker / LISA GRIMES6-4, 6-3
2023-05-17vs Team PhungWon 10
W#1 DoublesJesse Carrington / Brandie Sparr vs Trey Bergen / Brooke Lumb5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-06vs Team PhungLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Maier / Greg Leihy vs LISA GRIMES / Bruce Willhide7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Todd Cervini vs Rese Bergen / Trey Bergen4-6, 5-7
2023-04-15vs Team PhungWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Giap Nguyen vs John Jiang / Sara Vance6-2, 6-2
2023-04-08vs Team PhungWon 10
W#2 DoublesRick Gladwell / Brandie Sparr vs Bruce Willhide / Sara Vance6-4, 6-3
2023-04-05vs Team PhungWon 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Cervini / Brandie Sparr vs Clayton Coker / LISA GRIMES6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Calvert Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
J Harris
published 4
3.75
Brandie Sparr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Rick Gladwell
published
3.66
Susan Maier
published
3.63
Todd Cervini
published
3.63
Giap Nguyen
published 4
3.60
Greg Leihy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Joanne Connelly
published
3.50
Megan Gladwell
published
3.32
Kristina Lebron
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Leihy + Joanne Connelly1443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher MacWilliams
5W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
J Harris
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Brandie Sparr
104W–102L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
Rick Gladwell
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Susan Maier
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
Todd Cervini
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
4
Giap Nguyen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Greg Leihy
106W–109L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Joanne Connelly
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
Megan Gladwell
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Kristina Lebron
63W–53L career · 11 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.