Teams

PTighe (Blakeney)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Tues PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-25vs ALawler (WSRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Bergeson / Fernando Gevaerd vs MAGESH ARUMUGAM / Oluseun Alli7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricio Aycinena / Rodney Myers vs Vladislav Valtsis / George Koskinas7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTimothy Hodge / PATRICK TIGHE vs Todd Creange / Larry Hunt7-6, 6-1
2026-08-18vs AHunt (Charlotte Tennis Matthews)Won 21
W#1 DoublesFernando Gevaerd / Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan vs Christopher Greiner / Douglas Skrainka7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTimothy Hodge / PATRICK TIGHE vs David Whiteman / Andy Hunt0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDouglas Harrison / Leonard Evansek vs Paul Gress / David Richards6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Leonard Evansek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Michael van Bergen
published 3.5
3.30
Patricio Aycinena
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Timothy Hodge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Benjamin Bergeson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
PATRICK TIGHE
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Fernando Gevaerd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Rodney Myers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
2.83
Douglas Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Hafener
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael van Bergen + Rodney Myers4356% gamesnot enough data
PATRICK TIGHE + Indranil Bhattacharya314 matchesnot enough data
Michael van Bergen + Leonard Evansek213 matchesnot enough data
Jason Hafener + Leonard Evansek213 matchesnot enough data
Leonard Evansek + Indranil Bhattacharya303 matchesnot enough data
Leonard Evansek + Rodney Myers303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Leonard Evansek
186W–108L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Michael van Bergen
89W–79L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Patricio Aycinena
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Timothy Hodge
25W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Benjamin Bergeson
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan
5W–10L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
PATRICK TIGHE
28W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Fernando Gevaerd
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Rodney Myers
20W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Indranil Bhattacharya
35W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Douglas Harrison
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Jason Hafener
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.