Teams

Bl.Leippe18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2023-07-29Split 11
L#2 DoublesRebekah Sedaca / Jennifer Wolborsky vs Jessica Phillips / Catherine Taylor1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNgoc Tran / Marie Gelston vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-22vs Li.Ihly18TSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiane Abourisk / Rebekah Sedaca vs Gwynn Thayer / Kana Brinckerhoff1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNgoc Tran / Marie Gelston vs Jorgelina Stroud / Theresa Rosario-Jansen6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-17vs Am.Pena18TWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiane Abourisk / Donna Wells vs Laura Capps / Erin Swindell6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-16vs Ki.Johnson18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesNgoc Tran / Wendy Sielaty vs Phyllis Soltz / Caroline Fungaroli0-6, 4-6
2023-07-08vs To.Sutler18TLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmalie Levine / Diane Abourisk vs Sandra Rhoades / Holly Moore2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBladen Leippe / Laurie Reiss vs Lauren King / Allison DeMacy4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Gelston / Wendy Sielaty vs April Lyon / April Bazin0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-01vs Pa.Hankerson18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Abourisk / Emalie Levine vs Ashley McRae / Paulina Powierza2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesWendy Sielaty / Marie Gelston vs Vanessa Manuel / Jamie McCallum6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2023-06-27vs Lu.Lav18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Marie Gelston vs Katie Percy / Tara Spina1-6, 3-6
2023-06-24vs Li.Kempf18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Abourisk / Jennifer Kearney vs Elena Pinkus / Kimberly Patrey2-6, 0-6
2023-06-17vs Am.Odum18TWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Kearney / Heather Bilderback vs Courtney Whalen / KATRINA SIZEMORE1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Reiss / Amanda Mueller vs Lori Hatlen / Marina Barthalmus6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNgoc Tran / Marie Gelston vs Amanda Davis / Theresa Rosario-Jansen6-3, 6-4
2023-06-16vs Ka.Knoblauch18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Norma Wolcott vs Mary Grace Marlow / Mary Zimardo3-6, 3-6
2023-06-10vs La.Capps18TLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Wells / Heather Bilderback vs Kristi Koren / Erin Swindell3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kearney / Laurie Reiss vs Skylar Poole / Lindsey Klein2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBladen Leippe / Marie Gelston vs Amanda Lindsay / Laura Brown7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-06-05vs Pa.Hankerson18TWon 20
W#2 DoublesJennifer Kearney / Diane Abourisk vs Donna Misa / Paulina Powierza6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNgoc Tran / Jennifer Wolborsky vs Jamie McCallum / Jamiyla Bolton-Cubillan6-4, 6-4
2023-06-05vs Sh.Cole18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Marie Gelston vs Jade Paunovich / Kelly Huffstetler6-1, 6-4
2023-05-31vs To.Sutler18TSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHeather Bilderback / Jennifer Kearney vs Sandra Rhoades / Rochelle Grieco1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarie Gelston / Wendy Sielaty vs Debra Vaughn / Julie Clark5-7, 2-6
2023-05-22vs Li.Gorman18TSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Andino / Jennifer Wolborsky vs Cindy McCullough / Marlea Ward6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarie Gelston / Wendy Sielaty vs Lindsay Gorman / April Taylor6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Emalie Levine
published 3.5
3.44
Donna Wells
published 4
3.34
Heather Bilderback
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Diane Abourisk
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Laurie Reiss
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Marie Gelston
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Wolborsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.78
Wendy Sielaty
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Sielaty + Marie Gelston272450% games+0.9% vs expected
Marie Gelston + Jennifer Wolborsky332651% games−1.7% vs expected
Wendy Sielaty + Jennifer Wolborsky5650% gamesnot enough data
Diane Abourisk + Jennifer Wolborsky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emalie Levine
36W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
4
Donna Wells
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Heather Bilderback
127W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Diane Abourisk
104W–136L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Laurie Reiss
234W–202L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Marie Gelston
215W–161L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Jennifer Wolborsky
172W–237L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Wendy Sielaty
168W–185L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.