Teams

SD 8.0 Mtn View/ McLellan

2022 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SD · SD - Women - 8.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.79 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesRosie Wagner / Deborah Boehm vs Janene Christopher / Christine Golemb6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMariles Valencia / Bea Vega vs Terri Bourne / Becky Kuba6-3, 6-4
2022-08-10vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ AlvarezLost 12
L#1 DoublesBea McLellan / Wanda Jurlina vs Mia Vaughnes / Susie Alvarez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGyoku Block / Deborah Boehm vs Debra Reilly / Natalia Moskaleva1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichiyo Killeen / Rosie Wagner vs Becky Yzaguirre / Kim Latham7-5, 6-4
2022-08-03vs SD 8.0 SDTRC/ StowLost 12
L#1 DoublesWanda Jurlina / Rosie Wagner vs Yvonne Angyal / Annie Chambers6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMariles Valencia / Bea Vega vs Helen Beran / Chris Daher2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGyoku Block / Bea McLellan vs Carol Harris / Shane Rose6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-27vs SD 8.0 Lake Murray TC/ HartmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesWanda Jurlina / Bea Vega vs Alissa Weiss / Karen Brown5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMariles Valencia / Gyoku Block vs Lesley Stillwater / Carol Larsen7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBea McLellan / Michiyo Killeen vs Michelle Simpson / Colleen Hartman6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-20vs SD 8.0 Balboa TC/ LindemannWon 30
W#1 DoublesRosie Wagner / Wanda Jurlina vs Esther Leeflang / Maria Ward6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGyoku Block / Deborah Boehm vs Debbie Roberts / Suzanne Lindemann6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichiyo Killeen / Bea McLellan vs Cynthia Driver / Courtney Hayashi-Osorno6-3, 7-6
W#1 DoublesRosie Wagner / Deborah Boehm vs Lisa Moses / Janene Christopher6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBea Vega / Mariles Valencia vs Deborah Fitzgerald / Zhuoling Jia3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichiyo Killeen / Bea McLellan vs Rory Tarantino / Helen Bruton6-4, 6-1
2022-07-06vs SD 8.0 Mtn View/ AlvarezWon 21
W#1 DoublesBea McLellan / Wanda Jurlina vs Libby Campbell / Lynn Ryan7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGyoku Block / Rosie Wagner vs Susie Alvarez / Mia Vaughnes2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMariles Valencia / Bea Vega vs Sally Grauer / Becky Yzaguirre6-4, 6-0
2022-06-29vs SD 8.0 Balboa TC/ LindemannWon 30
W#1 DoublesWanda Jurlina / Bea McLellan vs Marcia Bennett / Debbie Roberts6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMariles Valencia / Bea Vega vs Debbie Gerlack / Mary Thomas7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichiyo Killeen / Rosie Wagner vs Cynthia Driver / Kristin Ryner7-5, 1-0
2022-06-22vs SD 8.0 Lake Murray TC/ HartmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesMariles Valencia / Bea Vega vs Karen Brown / Colleen Hartman4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesGyoku Block / Rosie Wagner vs Yvonne Garrett / Carol Larsen6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichiyo Killeen / Bea McLellan vs Mary Horton / Michelle Simpson7-5, 6-2
2022-06-15vs SD 8.0 SDTRC/ StowLost 12
L#1 DoublesBea Vega / Rosie Wagner vs Linda Milburn / Helen Beran2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMariles Valencia / Gyoku Block vs Jennie Blacker / Shane Rose5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichiyo Killeen / Bea McLellan vs Chris Daher / Christina Stow6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Bea McLellan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Wanda Jurlina
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Deborah Boehm
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Rosie Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.32
Michiyo Killeen
published 3.5
3.31
Mariles Valencia
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.27
Bea Vega
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bea Vega + Mariles Valencia181750% games−1.5% vs expected
Bea McLellan + Rosie Wagner61045% games−5.0% vs expected
Rosie Wagner + Bea Vega5848% gamesnot enough data
Bea McLellan + Mariles Valencia6552% gamesnot enough data
Rosie Wagner + Mariles Valencia1645% gamesnot enough data
Wanda Jurlina + Deborah Boehm1444% gamesnot enough data
Bea McLellan + Wanda Jurlina224 matchesnot enough data
Wanda Jurlina + Rosie Wagner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bea McLellan
62W–75L career · 9 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Wanda Jurlina
69W–74L career · 6 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Deborah Boehm
14W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Rosie Wagner
87W–136L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Michiyo Killeen
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
4
Mariles Valencia
48W–80L career · 8 lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
3.31
3.5
Bea Vega
154W–161L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.