Teams

7.0 Mixed 55 & Over Vanhootegem-Decatur

2025 Mixed Other 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesRobert Vanhootegem / Kathleen Sigle vs Tom Dermody / Patricia Wombacher6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRick McKirahan / Teri Scaggs vs A Spitalny / Sue Chelikas6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesCraig Conway / Jan Dickerson vs Tom Dermody / Lisa Bennett6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick McKirahan / Teri Scaggs vs Joe Mulcahey / Patricia Wombacher6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJan Dickerson / Craig Conway vs Lisa Bennett / Tom Dermody6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Sedory / Sean Miller vs Letitia Spirek-Algrain / Marcelo Algrain6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSally Boland / Robert Vanhootegem vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMihai Mihailescu / Sally Boland vs Marcelo Algrain / Letitia Spirek-Algrain6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSendhil Kumaran / Ginny Kerwin vs James Davis / Susan Davis6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesCraig Conway / Jan Dickerson vs A Spitalny / Sue Chelikas6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRick McKirahan / Rebecca Vanmeter vs Marcelo Algrain / Letitia Spirek-Algrain6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMihai Mihailescu / Sally Boland vs Tom Dermody / Soonok Cramer6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesRobert Vanhootegem / Kathleen Sigle vs A Spitalny / Joann Blair6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRick McKirahan / Rebecca Vanmeter vs Tom Dermody / Soonok Cramer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSendhil Kumaran / Laura Sedory vs Marcelo Algrain / Letitia Spirek-Algrain6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Mixed 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
17.0 Mixed 55 & Over Vanhootegem-Decatur60180056
27.0 Mixed 55 & Over Spitalny-Peoria0601836218

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Teri Scaggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Rebecca Vanmeter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.76
Robert Vanhootegem
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.61
Sendhil Kumaran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Sally Boland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Jan Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Craig Conway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Ginny Kerwin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Laura Sedory
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Hogan
published
Kathleen Sigle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mihai Mihailescu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rick McKirahan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Dickerson + Craig Conway14953% games−0.7% vs expected
Sally Boland + Robert Vanhootegem101247% games−10.1% vs expected
Teri Scaggs + Rick McKirahan7072% gamesnot enough data
Sally Boland + Mihai Mihailescu2446% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Sigle + Robert Vanhootegem5071% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Vanmeter + Robert Vanhootegem1438% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Sigle + Rick McKirahan134 matchesnot enough data
Ginny Kerwin + Rick McKirahan314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Teri Scaggs
129W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Rebecca Vanmeter
66W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
3.5
Robert Vanhootegem
95W–110L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.76
4
Sendhil Kumaran
40W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Sally Boland
161W–128L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Jan Dickerson
104W–104L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Craig Conway
36W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Ginny Kerwin
96W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Laura Sedory
21W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Janet Hogan
44W–41L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Sigle
12W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mihai Mihailescu
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rick McKirahan
28W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.