Teams

Peachtree Station (Tracie Nowak)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Lori Brown)

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-12-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesJill White / Kelly Traikovich vs Lynn Blanchard / Kimberly Brooks6-7, 6-3, 6-4
2022-12-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Traikovich / Jill White vs Rachel Turner / Jennifer Osbon2-6, 6-4, 2-6
2022-11-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesPenny Godwin / Kelly Traikovich vs Tavie Allan / Barbara Taylor6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Lori Brown) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Brenda DiGiacomo
published 4
3.90
Kristen Blood
published
3.89
Deborah Heald
published 4
3.80
Joan van Laeke
published
Ashley Harris
published 4
3.67
Lisa Weaver
published
3.51
Gretchen Schulz
published
3.49
Debra Halpern
published 3.5
3.47
Kristie Roe
published
3.47
Tracie Nowak
published
3.41
Cheryl Philipps
published 3.5
3.36
Erin Magee
published
3.27
Claire Hatten
published 3.5
Kelly Traikovich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan van Laeke + Kristen Blood5257% games+14.0% vs expected
Deborah Heald + Joan van Laeke7258% games+8.6% vs expected
Joan van Laeke + Gretchen Schulz14358% games+8.1% vs expected
Deborah Heald + Gretchen Schulz5452% games−4.2% vs expected
Cheryl Philipps + Gretchen Schulz0633% games−10.9% vs expected
Lisa Weaver + Tracie Nowak3352% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Heald + Tracie Nowak3253% gamesnot enough data
Joan van Laeke + Brenda DiGiacomo4163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brenda DiGiacomo
33W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
4.05
Kristen Blood
39W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.90
4
Deborah Heald
68W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
Joan van Laeke
46W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Ashley Harris
9W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Weaver
62W–24L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Gretchen Schulz
35W–38L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Debra Halpern
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kristie Roe
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
Tracie Nowak
24W–24L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Cheryl Philipps
19W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.41
Erin Magee
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.36
3.5
Claire Hatten
26W–34L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
Kelly Traikovich
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.