Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS CW8.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 8.5

23 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Sueyin Wong
published
4.20
Polly Paulsen
published
4.15
Catherine Vowles
published 4.5
4.15
Michele Lindzy
published
4.10
Erika LaMarch
published
4.06
Maddie Thomas
published
4.05
Fan Lau
published
4.05
Tina Baykaner
published
4.04
Jana Klein
published
4.01
Nicole Stephens
published
3.92
Rachel Gabato
published
3.90
Vidushi Bhargava
published
3.79
Jennifer Yeager
published
3.77
Janet Lautenberger
published
3.74
Lisa Laanisto
published
3.74
Tamara York
published
3.74
Ally Gwozdz
published 4
3.73
Helen Zhang
published
3.60
Dorsey O'Neill
published
3.60
Claudia Vlasak
published 4
3.48
Catherine Lacey
published 4
3.36
Patti O'Kelly
published
Katerina Novitskaya
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sueyin Wong + Nicole Stephens2350% games+1.2% vs expected
Sueyin Wong + Jennifer Yeager314 matchesnot enough data
Maddie Thomas + Ally Gwozdz314 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Stephens + Jennifer Yeager044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Laanisto + Janet Lautenberger314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sueyin Wong
13W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
4.36
Polly Paulsen
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Catherine Vowles
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
4.15
Michele Lindzy
34W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
4.15
Erika LaMarch
50W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
4.10
Maddie Thomas
61W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
4.06
Fan Lau
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
Tina Baykaner
24W–6L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
Jana Klein
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
Nicole Stephens
29W–36L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
4.01
Rachel Gabato
2W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
Vidushi Bhargava
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.90
Jennifer Yeager
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.79
Janet Lautenberger
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Lisa Laanisto
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Tamara York
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Ally Gwozdz
20W–17L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Helen Zhang
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
3.73
Dorsey O'Neill
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Claudia Vlasak
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Catherine Lacey
0W–13L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Patti O'Kelly
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.36
Katerina Novitskaya
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.