Teams

Montana/Ruthruff/55& Over7.0W

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 7.0 - 55 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-23vs Let it BounceWon 20
W#1 DoublesHiroko Yerkey / Jennifer Molinar vs Mary Milkovich / Dwanna Landrum6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMary Thane / Christine Caldwell vs DIANA RAIMONDO / Laura Toepfer6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-23vs MenopossiblesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Molinar / Mary Thane vs Janice Schenk / Shannon Johnson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHiroko Yerkey / Sherry Varner vs Ruby Graham / Nancy Kastner6-1, 6-2
2023-06-22vs MenopossiblesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Molinar / Hiroko Yerkey vs Ruby Graham / Cyndy Desin6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSherry Varner / Terri Ruthruff vs Janice Schenk / Nancy Kastner6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Thane / Christine Caldwell vs Cindy Woods / Laura Rembe4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-22vs Let it BounceWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Molinar / Terri Ruthruff vs Laura Toepfer / DIANA RAIMONDO6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSherry Varner / Hiroko Yerkey vs Dwanna Landrum / Mary Milkovich7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Jasmine / Christine Caldwell vs Marie Neergaard / Nora Miller7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 7.0 - 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Montana/Ruthruff/55& Over7.0W40120473
2Menopossibles134817127
3Let it Bounce1321021141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jennifer Molinar
published
3.38
Terri Ruthruff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Ann Tennyson
published 3.5
Christine Caldwell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Hiroko Yerkey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Mary Thane
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rebecca Jasmine
published
Sherry Varner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Ruthruff + Sherry Varner35961% games+2.5% vs expected
Hiroko Yerkey + Sherry Varner10457% gamesnot enough data
Christine Caldwell + Sherry Varner224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Molinar
29W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Terri Ruthruff
94W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Ann Tennyson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Christine Caldwell
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Hiroko Yerkey
50W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Mary Thane
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Jasmine
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherry Varner
80W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.