Teams

Bl.Hutchinson18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.61 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-27vs Ma.Treires18AWon 41
L#1 DoublesGeoffrey Vollman / Kwame Owens vs William Boyette / Alexander Neiberger6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJuan Manrique Romero vs Jack Davis6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrett Eckles / Andrew Perdue vs Mark Treires / Brandon Kessler6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesHerman Gudjonson vs James Treires6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoel Reiter / Nodirbek Korchiev vs William Gray / Richard McClenny6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-13vs De.Farmer18A4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesHerman Gudjonson / Jermaine Byrd vs Nathan Mercado / Jason Coble6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrew Perdue / Juan Manrique Romero vs Eric Roller / Bryan Gillespie6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKwame Owens / Blake Hutchinson vs Jon Ruliffson / LaQuon Gilchrist7-6, 6-0
2025-03-30vs Ma.Gregson18A4.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesJuan Manrique Romero vs Jackson Cabell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBeomjun Ju / Kwame Owens vs Tyler Carroll / Daniel Gallo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrett Eckles / Jermaine Byrd vs Matthew Hanauer / Sergii Porokh6-3, 7-5
2025-03-23vs Be.Koren18AWon 50
W#1 DoublesHerman Gudjonson / Ngoni Makambwa vs James JR Compton / Avery Sparrow6-2, 5-4
W#1 SinglesNodirbek Korchiev vs Michael McGuire6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJuan Manrique Romero / Beomjun Ju vs Scott Russell / Stuart Donovan6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJermaine Byrd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBlake Hutchinson / Kwame Owens vs Darin Meyer / Penn Holderness6-2, 6-1
2025-03-16vs Pe.Kelly18AWon 31
W#1 DoublesNodirbek Korchiev / Geoffrey Vollman vs Peter Kelly / Thomas Wilbur6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJuan Manrique Romero vs Mike Trefzger7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrett Eckles / Andrew Perdue vs Jackson Bowen / Eric Hilpert6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Herman Gudjonson vs Wilson Sawyer / Joao Freitas6-7, 4-6
2025-03-09vs Co.Vinson18AWon 32
W#1 DoublesBeomjun Ju / Kwame Owens vs Praveen Chandrasekhar / Carlos Garcia-Shelton5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNodirbek Korchiev vs Wei Han Bryan Lee3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrett Eckles / Andrew Perdue vs Cody Vinson / Shaun Ward3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJuan Manrique Romero vs Matthew Tomayko6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJermaine Byrd / Joel Reiter vs James Miron / Nick Brittis3-6, 3-6
2025-03-02vs Mi.Ladd18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesGeoffrey Vollman / Nodirbek Korchiev vs Murillo Pelegrino / Brett McLeod3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBrett Eckles vs Andrew Dinicola0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKwame Owens / Beomjun Ju vs Davis Felts / Douglas Friedman6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.74
Juan Manrique Romero
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.54
Herman Gudjonson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.52
Kwame Owens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.44
Andrew Perdue
published 4.5
4.43
Brett Eckles
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.42
Nodirbek Korchiev
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.26
Geoffrey Vollman
published
Blake Hutchinson
published 4.5
4.18
Joel Reiter
published
4.15
Beomjun Ju
published 4.5
4.13
Hyunseong Ahn
published
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Eckles + Andrew Perdue5254% games+4.2% vs expected
Brett Eckles + Herman Gudjonson6262% games+2.4% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Herman Gudjonson161257% games−5.0% vs expected
Jermaine Byrd + Kwame Owens4355% gamesnot enough data
Brett Eckles + Kwame Owens5165% gamesnot enough data
Jermaine Byrd + Brett Eckles3255% gamesnot enough data
Kwame Owens + Juan Manrique Romero123 matchesnot enough data
Kwame Owens + Herman Gudjonson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Juan Manrique Romero
35W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.74
4.5
Herman Gudjonson
115W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.54
5
Kwame Owens
168W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.52
4.5
Andrew Perdue
33W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Brett Eckles
223W–95L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Nodirbek Korchiev
38W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
4.42
Geoffrey Vollman
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Blake Hutchinson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joel Reiter
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Beomjun Ju
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Hyunseong Ahn
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
4.13
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 5 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.