Teams

YTC-McLean

2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-15vs PC-Happy HourWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Kimel / Terry Kempton vs Don Donais / Joyce Donais6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLiberty McLean / Aaron Matthias vs James Kirkham / Molly Kirkham6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJody Snyder / Eric Rasmussen vs Randy Gable / Midori Nyby2-6, 2-6
2022-10-15vs YTC-Kickin AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Livingston / Aaron Matthias vs Monte Scacco / Kim Scacco-Morton6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEric Rasmussen / Jody Snyder vs Audrey James / Jeffrey Vargas6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiberty McLean / Danny Sanchez vs Jenifer Busey / Ken Borello6-2, 6-3
2022-10-14vs PC-HolleWon 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Kimel / Terry Kempton vs Adam Hrebeniuk / Kristi Dawson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAaron Matthias / Liberty McLean vs Bryce Richardson / Lindy Bentley6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Livingston / Danny Sanchez vs Kristin Ruedel / Jeremey White7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YTC-McLean3072772
2IND-Sets Machine21541084
3PC-Holle12361389
4SRC-Inland Northwest12361488
5YTC-Kickin Aces03271494

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Danny Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Nancy Livingston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Cynthia Kimel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Eric Rasmussen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Aaron Matthias
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Jody Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Liberty McLean
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Terry Kempton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jody Snyder + Eric Rasmussen3443% games−10.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danny Sanchez
21W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
Nancy Livingston
65W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia Kimel
62W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Eric Rasmussen
9W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Aaron Matthias
22W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jody Snyder
50W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Liberty McLean
28W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terry Kempton
15W–26L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.