Teams

OC MissionBella - Great Park - Danielle

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-22vs OC Lifetime RSC - JeanetteLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Mesic / MacI Barton vs Susan Kerth / Nadine Friedman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Sigrist / JULIE WEIDNER vs Kelley Birmingham / Sharron Elias-Calles3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSharan Dhanjal / Catherine Payne vs Deborah Jenson / Christa Long0-6, 0-6
2024-11-08vs OC Marbella CC - SarahLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Mesic / JULIE WEIDNER vs Trisha Heppenstall / Briana Bellini4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Tripi / Sandy Patel vs Jennifer Kramer / Sarah Hallenbeck1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKristin Almieri / Catherine Payne vs Clare Haas / Ashley Graves5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-10-25vs OC T3 - JSerra - CrosbyLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Mesic / Kristin Almieri vs Kimberly Gambol / Chrissy Nordheim0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Thronson / Cheryl Flohr vs Georgina Rojas / Aydee Paredes0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMacI Barton / Catherine Payne vs Tara Melenick / Loriann Bartholomew6-7, 1-6
2024-10-18vs OC LNRC - AllysonWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacey Nishimura / Meghan Tripi vs Allyson Liu / Jen Innocenti3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandy Patel / Julia Tamayo vs Robyn Lee / Kelly Brochu6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Leplastrier / Casey Foster vs KIMBERLY CONROY / Michelle Hargrove7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-11vs OC Mission Viejo CC - KimLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Patel / Meghan Tripi vs Kristi Lee / Lauren Hauser0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeanine Campbell / JULIE WEIDNER vs Stacy Foust / Julie Carey7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSharan Dhanjal / Catherine Payne vs Amy Miley / Cindy Perkins3-6, 0-6
2024-09-27vs OC Dana Hills TC - SandyLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Mesic / Emily Leplastrier vs Sandy Sinden / Annette Eckhardt3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIrene Osiecki / Julie Gilpin vs Pamela Nicely / Stephanie Sunderman1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSusan Thronson / Sharan Dhanjal vs Mary Heyer / Patty Bell2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Lara Tracy
published
3.20
Jeanine Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
MacI Barton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
JULIE WEIDNER
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Elizabeth Mesic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Sandy Patel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Catherine Payne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Cheryl Flohr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Danielle Sigrist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Sharan Dhanjal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Kristin Almieri
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.13
Julia Tamayo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Leplastrier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Irene Osiecki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Gilpin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Meghan Tripi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stacey Nishimura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Thronson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Almieri + Julia Tamayo033 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Patel + Catherine Payne123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lara Tracy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jeanine Campbell
28W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.20
MacI Barton
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
JULIE WEIDNER
24W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
2.91
Elizabeth Mesic
5W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Sandy Patel
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
2.5
Catherine Payne
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Cheryl Flohr
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Danielle Sigrist
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
0%98%2%
2.20
Sharan Dhanjal
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.18
Kristin Almieri
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Julia Tamayo
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Emily Leplastrier
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Irene Osiecki
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Julie Gilpin
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Meghan Tripi
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacey Nishimura
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Susan Thronson
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.