Teams

55Pineapples

2021 Adult 55 and Over League · 7.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-04-25vs KLTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Bernstein / Beverly Ishii-Nakayama vs Maria Fe Bugal / Helen Ramos0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoan Kuh / Patricia Moore vs Gerri Takayama / Stephanie Tsuzaki5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesShirley Marks / Patty Schmitz vs Maria Kulka / Lori Loo7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-04-11vs KLTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Dinman / Linda Landau vs Iris Katsura / Karen Yamaguchi6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoan Kuh / Patty Schmitz vs Jo Ann Hirata / Helen Ramos1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVeronica Manz / Carole Petersen vs Ruby May Fernandez / Lori Loo3-6, 5-7
2021-04-11vs KLTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesVeronica Manz / Shirley Marks vs Gerri Takayama / Stephanie Tsuzaki4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Dinman / Patty Schmitz vs Ruby May Fernandez / Maria Kulka2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Moore / Martha Welch vs Maria Fe Bugal / Helen Ramos3-6, 3-6
2021-04-04vs KLTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Dinman / Linda Landau vs Lori Loo / Karen Yamaguchi6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWendy Barnfield / Suzanne Bernstein vs Ruby May Fernandez / Laura Shimada3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesShirley Marks / Martha Welch vs Gerri Takayama / Stephanie Tsuzaki1-6, 3-6
2021-03-27vs KLTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarole Petersen / Veronica Manz vs Jo Ann Hirata / Helen Ramos5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeverly Ishii-Nakayama / Ida Thiede vs Ruby May Fernandez / Iris Katsura3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Barnfield / Patricia Moore vs Laura Shimada / Stephanie Tsuzaki7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2021-03-24vs KLTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMartha Welch / Shirley Marks vs Karen Yamaguchi / Laura Shimada2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Barnfield / Suzanne Bernstein vs Maria Fe Bugal / Helen Ramos6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Landau / Kathleen Dinman vs Iris Katsura / Maria Kulka6-2, 6-2
2021-03-14vs KLTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeverly Ishii-Nakayama / Ida Thiede vs Lori Loo / Laura Shimada3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Bernstein / Patty Schmitz vs Iris Katsura / Karen Yamaguchi1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Kuh / Carole Petersen vs Jo Ann Hirata / Helen Ramos3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Linda Landau
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Beverly Ishii-Nakayama
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Carole Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Wendy Barnfield
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Kathleen Dinman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Ida Thiede
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Joan Kuh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.77
Patty Schmitz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Suzanne Bernstein
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Martha Welch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Moore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Shirley Marks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Veronica Manz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Welch + Patricia Moore6453% games+6.4% vs expected
Beverly Ishii-Nakayama + Wendy Barnfield4157% games+2.8% vs expected
Suzanne Bernstein + Patty Schmitz7846% games+1.1% vs expected
Shirley Marks + Martha Welch9855% games−0.4% vs expected
Patricia Moore + Wendy Barnfield5850% games−3.3% vs expected
Suzanne Bernstein + Wendy Barnfield3346% gamesnot enough data
Beverly Ishii-Nakayama + Ida Thiede033 matchesnot enough data
Patty Schmitz + Ida Thiede033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Landau
101W–91L career · 3 lines in 2021
64%36%<1%
3.95
3.5
Beverly Ishii-Nakayama
119W–104L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Carole Petersen
12W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Wendy Barnfield
77W–79L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Kathleen Dinman
57W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Ida Thiede
35W–81L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Joan Kuh
16W–42L career · 3 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
3
Patty Schmitz
35W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Suzanne Bernstein
31W–63L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Martha Welch
45W–33L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Moore
24W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shirley Marks
22W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Veronica Manz
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.