Teams

LEvansek (Blakeney)

2026 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-25vs CRabidou (Carmel)Won 21
L#1 SinglesManojkumar Panachikal Madhavan vs George Sistrunk4-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesLeonard Evansek vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMichel Abranches vs Scott Hansen6-4, 6-2
2026-07-06vs MFiddes (Raintree)Won 21
W#1 SinglesGanesh Pallem vs Josh Wolff6-1, 7-5
L#2 SinglesRishi Gogate vs Michael Fresina4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMichel Abranches vs Brian Austin6-1, 6-2
2026-06-29vs KFranks (PPRSC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesNARAYANA REDDY Nalamalpu vs John Scovanner7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRishi Gogate vs Rod Wilkes6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesManojkumar Panachikal Madhavan vs Alan Roll6-3, 6-1
2026-06-22vs EOBrien (WSRC)Won 21
L#1 SinglesRishi Gogate vs Jaiganesh Rajamanickam6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLeonard Evansek vs Kevin Stein6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesManojkumar Panachikal Madhavan vs Eric O'Brien6-3, 6-1
2026-06-15vs DBarden (Mountainbrook)Won 30
W#1 SinglesGanesh Pallem vs Heyward Bouknight7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNARAYANA REDDY Nalamalpu vs Patrick Blandford6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMichel Abranches vs Daniel Malecki4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-14vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesGanesh Pallem vs Burns McGarry1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesRishi Gogate vs Darden Blow0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesMichel Abranches vs Victor Ellison3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-06-08vs HMahgoub/DMichael (PCC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesNARAYANA REDDY Nalamalpu vs Mark Richards6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesGanesh Pallem vs Raul Zamudio6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesRishi Gogate vs Hani Mahgoub4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
NARAYANA REDDY Nalamalpu
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.47
Ganesh Pallem
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Leonard Evansek
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Rishi Gogate
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.24
Michel Abranches
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.18
Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

NARAYANA REDDY Nalamalpu
42W–17L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Ganesh Pallem
129W–71L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Leonard Evansek
186W–108L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Rishi Gogate
47W–76L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Michel Abranches
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan
5W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.