Teams

Sturtz

2021 Carroll Mixed 40 & Over · Carroll Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-21vs JacksonLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristopher Williams / Stephanie Ruskin vs Stuart Cohen / Bethany Henderson1-6, 1-6
2021-05-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Mitchell / Tammi Molavi vs Clarence Slayton / Mary Brennan-Jones3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-05-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Williams / Shelley Sturtz vs Dennis Foltin / Stephanie Johns2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-03vs JonesWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarlos Raul Jimenez / Tammi Molavi vs Michelle Bailey-Hedgepeth / Jim Slaughter6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesShelley Sturtz / Christopher Williams vs Frances Logan / John Lynam6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-01vs JacksonLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Williams / Stephanie Ahmed vs Jim Jackson / Bethany Henderson1-6, 1-6
2021-04-18vs JacksonLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Stromberg / Jeannie Yep vs Jim Jackson / Bethany Henderson2-6, 2-6
2021-04-11vs JonesWon 10
W#3 DoublesTammi Molavi / LARRY DAVIDSON vs Vicki Fussell / John Lynam6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Carroll Mixed 40 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Ken Mitchell
published
3.38
Greg Koch
published 3.5
Carlos Raul Jimenez
published 3.5
Christopher Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Stephanie Ahmed
published
3.23
Feliz Steele
published 3.5
3.19
Tammi Molavi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.71
Jeannie Yep
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Stephanie Ruskin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Patricia Lopez
published
Shelley Sturtz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammi Molavi + Greg Koch3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Mitchell
15W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Greg Koch
18W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Carlos Raul Jimenez
1W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Christopher Williams
109W–110L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephanie Ahmed
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Feliz Steele
34W–26L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Tammi Molavi
115W–132L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Jeannie Yep
126W–174L career · 1 line in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Stephanie Ruskin
141W–155L career · 1 line in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
Patricia Lopez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
2.54
Shelley Sturtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.