Teams

SGV Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8

2026 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-21vs SGV Triforces-D.Li-WN/SU10Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Chang / Feibi Liu vs David Li / George Llewellyn3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichael Pang vs Anthony Tsao6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLam Bui vs Fangrui Chen2-6, 3-6
2026-06-20vs SGV Dare Doubles - Yeh-WN/SU12Won 30
W#1 DoublesTim Nasseir / Jermaine Waltemeyer vs Charles Maroun / Travis Hatfield6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDerek Fu vs Peter Yen6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMichael Pang vs Jesse Rosas4-6, 3-0
2026-06-14vs SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SU10Won 32
L#1 DoublesMichael Pang / Christopher Li vs Gary Kevanian / Kou Ninomiya2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesDerek Fu vs Stever Leung6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLam Bui / Robert Chang vs Rex Sheng / Phong Ngo6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesTim Nasseir vs Judd Tongprajiad3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Cheng / Jermaine Waltemeyer vs Jacky Lin / Owen Preston6-4, 6-4
2026-06-07vs SGV H-D-P-Villarino-WN/SU2Won 41
W#1 DoublesChristopher Li / Michael Pang vs Juan Carlos Hernandez / Vicman Garcialepe6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDerek Fu vs Arnold Lopez6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLam Bui / Robert Chang vs Christian Crosbie / Robert de la Costa6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTim Nasseir vs Marco Cruzado2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGEVORG KASABIAN / CHIH HAO PAN vs Alfred Salazar / Martin Vasquez7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDerek Fu / Michael Pang vs Anurag Anand / Thomas Vielajus2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGEVORG KASABIAN vs Jerik Centeno1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLam Bui / Robert Chang vs Kasper Lim / Martin Chi3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJames Phan vs Dastan Mazhetayev5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJermaine Waltemeyer / Tim Nasseir vs Blason Taon / Kevin Chong6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLam Bui / Peter Cheng vs Joshua Esparza / Nicolas Velazco4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichael Pang vs Juan Francisco JR Betancourt3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGEVORG KASABIAN / Tim Nasseir vs Aditya Venkatraman / Jose Ochoa6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesLam Bui / Tim Nasseir vs Vladimir Abadzhev / Bradley Harris6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichael Pang vs Nicola Pancotti6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesFeibi Liu / Walther Rodriguez vs Andy Miller / Dave Sparks6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGEVORG KASABIAN vs Simon Kim5-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesDerek Fu / Michael Pang vs James Lee / George Cheah6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJames Phan vs Manuel Almazan6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTim Nasseir / Jermaine Waltemeyer vs Shih-hao James Pang / Keon Ha Hwang1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJerry Li / Walther Rodriguez vs Woo Kim / Joseph Dychioco6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Michael Pang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
3.90
Walther Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Jermaine Waltemeyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Christopher Li
published 4
3.74
Tim Nasseir
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.72
Derek Fu
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
CHIH HAO PAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Feibi Liu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
GEVORG KASABIAN
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Lam Bui
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
James Phan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.26
Peter Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Chinna Ponnaganti
published 3.5
Jerry Li
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Fu + Michael Pang123 matchesnot enough data
Peter Cheng + Lam Bui213 matchesnot enough data
Jermaine Waltemeyer + Tim Nasseir123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Pang
20W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Walther Rodriguez
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Jermaine Waltemeyer
21W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Christopher Li
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Nasseir
14W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Derek Fu
12W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
CHIH HAO PAN
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Feibi Liu
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
GEVORG KASABIAN
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
Lam Bui
12W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.39
James Phan
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
Peter Cheng
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
3.5
Chinna Ponnaganti
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jerry Li
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.