Teams

BROADSTONE RC CW6.5A-DT

2025 COMBO - Daytime · Women 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-01vs STONEGATE CC CW6.5A-DTLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatrin Chutka / Carrie Lancaster vs Camille Leyson / Theresa Pistochini3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Minghelli / Laura Bardini vs Maria Mira / Daphne Leachman0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Woo / Susan Manger vs Cindy Toy / Heather Hough0-6, 1-6
2025-08-27vs STONEGATE CC CW6.5A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatrin Chutka / Laura Bardini vs Cindy Toy / Mary Ostrem1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSherri Coleman / Chris Feusahrens vs Camille Leyson / Daphne Leachman2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAlissa Faith / Carrie Lancaster vs Maria Mira / Elaine Snow6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Katrin Chutka
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Leanne Weaver
published
3.30
Shizuka Wire
published
Alissa Faith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Carly Singleton
published 3.5
3.18
Carmen Alcantara
published 3.5
3.06
Susan Grahame
published
3.06
Carrie Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Jacque Penn
published
2.92
Teresa Wagoner
published
2.88
Sherri Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Chris Feusahrens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Susan Manger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Kim Vargas
published
2.74
Laura Bardini
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Cindy Minghelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Sandra Woo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katrin Chutka
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Leanne Weaver
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Shizuka Wire
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
3.5
Alissa Faith
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carly Singleton
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carmen Alcantara
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Susan Grahame
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Carrie Lancaster
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Jacque Penn
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Teresa Wagoner
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Sherri Coleman
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3.5
Chris Feusahrens
1W–8L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
Susan Manger
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Kim Vargas
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Laura Bardini
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Cindy Minghelli
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Sandra Woo
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.