Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Heller

2022 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 3.0M

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-01-07vs Sports Mall-NelsonWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesSameer Bhadouria / Eddie Fung vs Sean Picou / BART SHARP6-4, 7-6
2022-12-10vs Liberty Park Tennis-BalchLost 02
L#1 Male DoublesSameer Bhadouria / Eddie Fung vs Chris Porter / Shawn Lay7-6, 3-4, 0-1
L#3 Male DoublesRick Cromar / Brent Higgs vs Glenn Bailey / Benjamin Wilson6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-12-03vs Salt Lake Tennis-BrackenWon 10
W#3 Male DoublesBrent Higgs / Rick Cromar vs Eric Christensen / Carl Culver1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-11-19vs Sports Mall-Bachman/RozsaLost 01
L#2 Male DoublesEddie Fung / Sameer Bhadouria vs Daniel Cobbley / Arasu Gopinath1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-11-12Lost 01
L#3 Male DoublesSameer Bhadouria / Mark Ponseti vs Brian Smith / Greg Ostrander3-6, 6-7
2022-11-05vs Liberty Park-VisserWon 10
W#3 Male DoublesBrent Higgs / Matthew Coleman vs Tim Bacheller / Andrius Sidlauskas6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Eric Barnhill
published 3.5
3.15
Myles Ozo
published 3
3.14
Matthew Heller
published
3.05
Briton McConkie
published 3.5
2.83
Sameer Bhadouria
usually #2 Male Doubles 50%, also #3 Male Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Eddie Fung
published 3
2.78
STEVE MATSEN
published
2.46
Rick Cromar
published
2.37
Brent Higgs
usually #3 Male Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Mark Ponseti
published
Matthew Coleman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sameer Bhadouria + Eddie Fung17661% games+2.8% vs expected
STEVE MATSEN + Eddie Fung2345% games−10.9% vs expected
Matthew Coleman + Matthew Heller404 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Heller + Briton McConkie224 matchesnot enough data
Sameer Bhadouria + Brent Higgs213 matchesnot enough data
Brent Higgs + Eddie Fung123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eric Barnhill
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Myles Ozo
73W–57L career · no lines in 2022
<1%13%87%
3.15
Matthew Heller
65W–55L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Briton McConkie
28W–27L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Sameer Bhadouria
94W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Eddie Fung
68W–75L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
STEVE MATSEN
43W–34L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Rick Cromar
27W–59L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
2.46
2.5
Brent Higgs
31W–116L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%84%16%
2.37
Mark Ponseti
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Coleman
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.