Teams

Diva Thunder

2026 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 2.90 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-05Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLindsay Hemmer vs Gillian Donahey5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-30vs Chick KickersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLindsay Hemmer vs Angela Troy3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Engroff / Ahnna Dudley vs Kelly Tonkin / Erin Engles3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-28vs Forty LoveSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hemmer vs Teresa Thonney4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim McReynolds / Quinn Eidsness vs Barbara Wessner / Nancy Gordon6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-21vs SwingersWon 10
W#3 DoublesAhnna Dudley / Elizabeth Engroff vs Deborah Whipple / Theresa Janecek7-6, 3-0
2026-04-16vs SCCPSSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hemmer vs Kimberly Coppenrath6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPamela Brady / Ahnna Dudley vs Kim Roth / Anke Heineck5-7, 1-6
2026-04-14vs Nice HitsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLindsay Hemmer vs Jill Peterson0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMonica Sorensen / Pamela Brady vs Susan Lehner / Marilyn Ludt6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-09vs Oh Balls!Won 20
W#2 DoublesAhnna Dudley / Elizabeth Engroff vs Michelle Francel / Shelley Lundstedt6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMonica Sorensen / Pamela Brady vs Liz Barbee / Chelsea Hiatt6-2, 6-0
2026-04-07vs Having a BallWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsay Hemmer vs Judy DeBoer6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Brady / Kim McReynolds vs Cathy Cooper / Brenda Krempaszky6-3, 6-0
2026-04-02vs Serving Up SassLost 02
L#1 DoublesQuinn Eidsness / Ahnna Dudley vs Shawnee Perdue / Amy Pugsley0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKim McReynolds / Pamela Brady vs Stacey Kozakar / Lynn Clark3-6, 4-6
2026-03-31vs Lob SquadWon 20
W#2 DoublesSaundra Coronado / Ahnna Dudley vs Sally Gottschall / Elaine Key6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKim McReynolds / Pamela Brady vs Abby Burtness / Kara Taub6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Serving Up Sass9131919245
2SCCPS82271331290
3Diva Thunder55251538292
4Chick Kickers55182249369
5Oh Balls!37162452390
6Lob Squad19103062410
7Having a Ball01053570440

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Ahnna Dudley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Ashlee Bauter
published 3
2.64
Elizabeth Engroff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.63
Monica Sorensen
published 3
Caroline Burke
published 2.5
Kari Forney
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kim McReynolds
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lindsay Hemmer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lori Barnum
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Maureen Sykes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Pamela Brady
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Quinn Eidsness
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Saundra Coronado
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
Sherri Matney
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Sorensen + Elizabeth Engroff21029% games−5.1% vs expected
Lori Barnum + Sherri Matney112842% gamesnot enough data
Monica Sorensen + Saundra Coronado141046% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Sykes + Sherri Matney71145% gamesnot enough data
Saundra Coronado + Elizabeth Engroff2738% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Sykes + Monica Sorensen0839% gamesnot enough data
Monica Sorensen + Sherri Matney2642% gamesnot enough data
Sherri Matney + Saundra Coronado1641% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ahnna Dudley
14W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Ashlee Bauter
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Engroff
25W–44L career · 14 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Monica Sorensen
27W–45L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.63
2.5
Caroline Burke
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kari Forney
32W–30L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kim McReynolds
9W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsay Hemmer
11W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Barnum
35W–96L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maureen Sykes
29W–64L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pamela Brady
20W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Quinn Eidsness
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Saundra Coronado
64W–77L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sherri Matney
43W–90L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.