Teams

NWW-FC-Ferrin

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-12vs HBSQ-Let's Go!!! KorchWon 30
W#1 DoublesKazue Wickens / Lolly Bates vs Julie Meyer / Anne Papik6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMonika Dalkin / Cheryl Isen vs Lori van Holmes / Martha Hesch6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTeresa Graff / Sally Ferrin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-05vs NWW-MI-GovierWon 30
W#1 DoublesTeresa Graff / Sue Verduin vs Janice Levesque Bishop / Sharon Jaeger7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKazue Wickens / Lolly Bates vs Susan Regan / Lucy Olson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMonika Dalkin / Cheryl Isen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-29vs NWW-MI-GovierWon 21
L#1 DoublesMonika Dalkin / Cheryl Isen vs Kitty Flaherty / Janice Levesque Bishop2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLolly Bates / Kazue Wickens vs Kay Lorrain / Denise Kaestle6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTeresa Graff / Sue Verduin vs Joanne Jacoby / Sharon Jaeger1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-20vs BC-DunlopLost 12
L#1 DoublesMonika Dalkin / Gini Bouche vs Carmen Almodovar / Valerie Brown6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTeresa Graff / Sally Ferrin vs Denise Nolan / Ann Imus6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKay Coghlan / Lolly Bates vs Angela Peixotto-Monk / Kris Stimpson0-6, 3-6
2026-05-18vs WSC-Smith 8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesGini Bouche / Sue Verduin vs Sue Thompson / Susan Thim6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSally Ferrin / Teresa Graff vs Ge Li / Nancy Roma6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesNancy Rutter / Kay Coghlan vs Barbara Smith / Pawitri Price6-2, 6-3
2026-05-12vs HBSQ-Let's Go!!! KorchWon 30
W#1 DoublesGini Bouche / Sue Verduin vs Debbie Montgomery / Evelyn Yu6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSally Ferrin / Monika Dalkin vs Julie Meyer / Melanie Korch6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKazue Wickens / Lolly Bates vs Patricia Carow / Sheilah Clark6-2, 6-2
2026-05-01vs BC-DunlopWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Ferrin / Gini Bouche vs Angela Peixotto-Monk / Sue Matyas7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonika Dalkin / Cheryl Isen vs Bonnie Paasche / Dianne Discolo6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTeresa Graff / Sue Verduin vs Denise Nolan / Ann Imus3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-04-24vs WSC-Smith 8.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesGini Bouche / Sally Ferrin vs Kathleen Gilkey / Susan Thim6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKay Coghlan / Nancy Rutter vs Nancy Roma / Anna Karlin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMonika Dalkin / Cheryl Isen vs Pawitri Price / Kimberly Dirksen6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Lolly Bates
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.12
Nancy Rutter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.95
Gini Bouche
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Monika Dalkin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.83
Sue Verduin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Cheryl Isen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Teresa Graff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Sally Ferrin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Kazue Wickens
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.28
Kay Coghlan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kazue Wickens + Lolly Bates9068% games+5.5% vs expected
Monika Dalkin + Sally Ferrin8359% games+5.5% vs expected
Gini Bouche + Sally Ferrin20658% games+3.0% vs expected
Teresa Graff + Sally Ferrin8654% games−0.5% vs expected
Gini Bouche + Nancy Rutter7849% games−1.1% vs expected
Sue Verduin + Teresa Graff151154% games−2.4% vs expected
Monika Dalkin + Lolly Bates4155% gamesnot enough data
Monika Dalkin + Cheryl Isen4174% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lolly Bates
49W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Nancy Rutter
54W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
4.12
4
Gini Bouche
107W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Monika Dalkin
84W–57L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Sue Verduin
79W–44L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Cheryl Isen
83W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Teresa Graff
77W–70L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Sally Ferrin
94W–60L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Kazue Wickens
41W–9L career · type A · 9 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Kay Coghlan
111W–79L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.