Teams

Westrick 40s 3.5W Tues PM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-06vs Bushnell 40s 3.5W Tues PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesAriane Cox / Yvonne McConachie vs Christina Mohorn / Ashley Raper6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Elam / Bobbie Westrick vs Amy Mooney / Ariel Holtzman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesApril McAfee / Kim Edwards vs Michelle Swinyer / Joanne Lahey6-4, 6-0
2025-04-29vs Williams 40s 3.5M Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesBobbie Westrick / Jill Elam vs Gladys Dunn / Janess Reyna2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Benda / Yvonne McConachie vs Elizabeth Tiedemann / Rose Chrismon6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTrish Holder / Dawn Frank vs Jennifer Phelps / Melissa Rainey6-1, 6-3
2025-04-22vs McPherson/Allred 40s 3.5W Tues PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesYvonne McConachie / Ariane Cox vs Megan Noltemeyer / Stacy Thurm7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAnne Benda / Kim Edwards vs Betsy Harrington / Tammy McGinn3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBobbie Westrick / April McAfee vs Jennifer Russell / Diane Puckett6-3, 6-1
2025-04-15vs Manning 40s 3.5W Tues PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesBobbie Westrick / Jill Elam vs Krisla Berreth / Judy Eaton1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Benda / Trish Holder vs Margaret Reynolds / Patty Dutton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAriane Cox / Yvonne McConachie vs Lisa Roach / Margaret Joseph6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Fields 40s 3.5W Tues PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Elam / Trish Holder vs Hilary Holderness / Sandy Cathers6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnne Benda / April McAfee vs Ginger Ballard / Jane Forbes Fields7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKim Edwards / Bobbie Westrick vs Caroline Walker / Tara Davis3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-04-01vs Bushnell 40s 3.5W Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesDawn Frank / Bobbie Westrick vs Jessica Huellmantel / Christina Mohorn1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTrish Holder / Jill Elam vs Michelle Swinyer / Simara Levi6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKim Edwards / Ariane Cox vs Donna Burick / Linda Shuster7-6, 6-0
2025-03-25vs Williams 40s 3.5M Tues PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesApril McAfee / Trish Holder vs Gladys Dunn / Natalie Koeplinger4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAriane Cox / Yvonne McConachie vs Tamieka Howell / Elizabeth Tiedemann4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Benda / Kim Edwards vs Frida Nordmark / Sharon Williams5-7, 4-6
2025-03-18vs McPherson/Allred 40s 3.5W Tues PMLost 12
W#1 DoublesApril McAfee / Bobbie Westrick vs Erin Cockman / Betsy Harrington7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDawn Frank / Yvonne McConachie vs Kelly Glick / Jennifer Klein1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJill Elam / Trish Holder vs Julie McPherson / Andrea Thomas3-6, 4-6
2025-03-04vs Fields 40s 3.5W Tues PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesApril McAfee / Trish Holder vs Debbie Johnson / Sandy Cathers3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAriane Cox / Kim Edwards vs Jane Forbes Fields / DEBORAH WELLS3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDawn Frank / Yvonne McConachie vs Tracey Grayzer / Kimberley Cathey6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
April McAfee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Bobbie Westrick
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.22
Ariane Cox
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.16
Yvonne McConachie
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.09
Dawn Frank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Anne Benda
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.97
Jill Elam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Trish Holder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ariane Cox + Bobbie Westrick134 matchesnot enough data
Ariane Cox + Yvonne McConachie404 matchesnot enough data
Jill Elam + Bobbie Westrick134 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Frank + Bobbie Westrick123 matchesnot enough data
Trish Holder + Jill Elam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
April McAfee
8W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Bobbie Westrick
26W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Ariane Cox
14W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Yvonne McConachie
15W–32L career · 7 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Dawn Frank
12W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Anne Benda
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Jill Elam
19W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Trish Holder
4W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.