Teams

Woodlake Hannon

2021 Richmond Working Women · Working Women 7.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-24vs Bon Air RhodesWon 20
W#2 Female DoublesJeanean Phelps / Stacy Wiseman vs Nancy Metz / Pamela Blackburn6-1, 6-2
W#3 Female DoublesKaren Hannon / Crissy Poindexter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-17vs MAC ScottLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesMylan Barfield / Diane Thexton vs Susan Greenspoon / Sabrina Graff0-6, 4-6
2021-05-11vs RCC KochLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesJeanean Phelps / Mylan Barfield vs Kathleen Jackson / Nancy Price3-6, 4-6
2021-05-10vs CCV BealeWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesDiane Thexton / Mylan Barfield vs Windy Campbell / Robin Reifsnider6-3, 6-2
W#2 Female DoublesKaren Hannon / Jennifer Harris vs Paige Forrest / Molly Newcomb6-3, 6-3
L#3 Female DoublesJeanean Phelps / Elizabeth Nottingham vs Thornton Lambert / MaryLee Baker4-6, 4-6
2021-04-26vs Raintree EntersSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesMylan Barfield / Diane Thexton vs Kathy Flowers / Brenda Tyson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 Female DoublesKaren Hannon / Jayne Deck vs Sharon Camden / Amy Scherer0-6, 2-6
2021-04-12vs Willow Oaks SampsonWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesKaren Hannon / Robin Oldt vs Peyton Curdts / Kristin Hamlin7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Working Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Mylan Barfield
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Robin Oldt
published
2.91
Crissy Poindexter
published 3.5
2.90
Jeanean Phelps
usually #3 Female Doubles 33%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Karen Hannon
usually #3 Female Doubles 75%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Rosie Ortiz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanean Phelps + Karen Hannon044 matchesnot enough data
Mylan Barfield + Karen Hannon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mylan Barfield
100W–53L career · 4 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Robin Oldt
13W–7L career · no lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Crissy Poindexter
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
76%24%<1%
2.91
Jeanean Phelps
145W–152L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
Karen Hannon
66W–116L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.78
Rosie Ortiz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.