Teams

Terminetters

2023 Washington D.C. Tri-Level 18 & Over · Washington D.C. Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-19vs Piney RunLost 01
L#2 DoublesLew Taylor / Sergei Freidzon vs Lycurtis Wortham / Keenan Forbes2-6, 1-6
2023-11-04vs Piney RunLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Romano / Neeraj Gupta vs Gerald Anekwe / Samuel Fontanez3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-10-21vs Piney RunLost 01
L#3 DoublesLew Taylor / Mardi Muru vs Gabriel Diaz / Keenan Forbes5-7, 3-5
2023-10-08vs Piney RunLost 01
L#2 DoublesLew Taylor / Cory McCart vs Thomas Calhoun / Steven Park3-6, 1-6
2023-10-07vs Piney RunWon 10
W#3 DoublesLew Taylor / Mardi Muru vs Gabriel Diaz / Keenan Forbes7-5, 3-4
2023-09-30vs Piney RunLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Romano / Sergei Freidzon vs Gerald Anekwe / Samuel Fontanez2-6, 3-6
2023-09-24vs Piney RunLost 02
L#1 DoublesJustin Romano / Phil Reamer vs Samuel Fontanez / Terrence Austin4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEric Ritz / Lew Taylor vs Gabriel Diaz / Keenan Forbes3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Tri-Level 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Justin Romano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Viet Shelton
published
3.09
Neeraj Gupta
published
3.01
Lew Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Elliot Mamet
published 3
2.79
Desmond LaMar
published 3
Daniel Beesley
published 3
2.51
Eric Ritz
published 2.5
Mardi Muru
published
Sergei Freidzon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Desmond LaMar + Lew Taylor5257% games+2.2% vs expected
Desmond LaMar + Elliot Mamet2443% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Justin Romano
91W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Viet Shelton
42W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Neeraj Gupta
18W–21L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Lew Taylor
44W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Elliot Mamet
23W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Desmond LaMar
101W–129L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Daniel Beesley
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Eric Ritz
9W–25L career · no lines in 2023
0%46%54%
2.51
Mardi Muru
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sergei Freidzon
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.