Teams

SGV Smashers 55-Kagan-WN/SA

2025 Adult Division - 55 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.39 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SGV - Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Lai Chan
published
3.39
Mary Goff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.26
Keiko Kagan
published
3.20
Virginia Takeuchi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Pei Fu
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.17
Ruth McNulty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jane Caldito
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Kathleen Janisch
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Carrie Gasper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.90
Maribeth F Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
CARA Yokomizo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ginger Vasquez
published
Sandy Weyant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Janisch + Pei Fu10358% gamesnot enough data
Pei Fu + Jane Caldito8552% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Janisch + Carrie Gasper4547% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Gasper + Virginia Takeuchi4358% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Gasper + Ruth McNulty6164% gamesnot enough data
Mary Goff + Pei Fu314 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Gasper + Pei Fu314 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Janisch + Virginia Takeuchi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lai Chan
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Mary Goff
74W–44L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Keiko Kagan
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Virginia Takeuchi
112W–106L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Pei Fu
85W–49L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Ruth McNulty
67W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Jane Caldito
102W–106L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Kathleen Janisch
60W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Carrie Gasper
189W–211L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Maribeth F Rodriguez
164W–169L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
CARA Yokomizo
23W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Ginger Vasquez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandy Weyant
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.