Teams

Drop Shot Divas

2023 40&Over Women Spring · Summer

22 players · average NTRP 3.55 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-15vs Eastern/Martin/40&Over3.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesLan Luo / Sawako Ueda vs Cynda Kliewe / Therese Martin1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnnie Pollina / Annie Ran vs Linda Maffeo-Melloy / Megan McCay3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Pass / Noreen Harris Baer vs Maria LaGratta / Tami Sasala3-6, 3-6
2023-06-01vs Spring FlingWon 40
W#1 DoublesSherla Glasgow / Sawako Ueda vs Maura Wilson / Kristi Linz6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLan Luo vs Melanie Neubelt6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTracey Balestrieri / Andrea Chu vs Dawn Petillo / Lisa Hart6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesYuan Li / Dawn Wong vs Krista Olsen-Dibsie / Maryann Manning3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-11vs Eastern/Martin/40&Over3.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Paladino / Lan Luo vs Cynda Kliewe / Nora King1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChloris Li / Sawako Ueda vs Linda Maffeo-Melloy / Kristy DeCresce2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNoreen Harris Baer / Dawn Wong vs Erina Watts / Tami Sasala2-6, 1-6
2023-04-27vs Spring FlingWon 31
W#1 DoublesSawako Ueda / Natalia Mitrofanova vs Patty Thompson / Khanh Pham6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJill Gottlieb-Wilson vs Amy Stark6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Koymen / Helen Geary vs Evie Moldaver / Kristi Linz4-6, 4-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChloris Li / Sarah Lin vs Lisa Reale / Laura Sheehy7-6, 5-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Joyce Zhao
published
3.66
Amy Koymen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Lan Luo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.48
Sherla Glasgow
published 3.5
3.44
Annie Ran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Helen Geary
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Annie Pollina
published 3.5
Andrea Chu
published 3.5
3.25
Tammy Fighera
published 3.5
3.24
Natalia Mitrofanova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Chloris Li
published 3.5
3.21
Brenda Rollings
published 3.5
3.17
Keiko Gendi
published 3.5
3.15
Sarah Lin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dawn Wong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Heather Pass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Gottlieb-Wilson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Noreen Harris Baer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sawako Ueda
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stephanie Paladino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tracey Balestrieri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Yuan Li
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Chu + Annie Pollina6456% games+10.5% vs expected
Lan Luo + Chloris Li7363% games+10.5% vs expected
Chloris Li + Sawako Ueda6453% games+6.6% vs expected
Sarah Lin + Andrea Chu7256% games+5.2% vs expected
Sherla Glasgow + Amy Koymen6062% games+4.0% vs expected
Tammy Fighera + Helen Geary7264% games+3.5% vs expected
Brenda Rollings + Keiko Gendi474251% games+3.2% vs expected
Joyce Zhao + Andrea Chu6255% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Zhao
51W–23L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Amy Koymen
107W–69L career · 1 line in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Lan Luo
102W–77L career · 3 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Sherla Glasgow
240W–165L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
4
Annie Ran
37W–39L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.44
Helen Geary
65W–38L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Annie Pollina
56W–75L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Andrea Chu
84W–55L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Tammy Fighera
61W–46L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Natalia Mitrofanova
36W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Chloris Li
115W–69L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Brenda Rollings
71W–64L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Keiko Gendi
69W–56L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.17
Sarah Lin
87W–108L career · 1 line in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Dawn Wong
68W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Heather Pass
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jill Gottlieb-Wilson
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Noreen Harris Baer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sawako Ueda
29W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Paladino
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Tracey Balestrieri
63W–53L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Yuan Li
74W–37L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.