Teams

PA Kienast FWL A18-4.5WW

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL A18&O 4.5 WW (5 player)

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-01-22vs MY Brown FWL A18-4.5WWWon 10
W#1 DoublesRemington Gerst / Amanda Granger vs Patricia Wright / Ronda Stafford7-5, 6-2
2022-01-08vs MY Brown FWL A18-4.5WWWon 10
W#1 DoublesRemington Gerst / Kalan Walters vs Joan Hannadarrell / Victoria Krievs6-1, 6-1
2021-12-11vs MVH Neubert FWL A18-4.5WWWon 10
W#1 DoublesIsabella Buck / Remington Gerst vs Kirsten Boyer / Natalie Hazen7-5, 6-2
2021-11-14vs MVH Neubert FWL A18-4.5WWLost 03
L#1 DoublesRemington Gerst / Isabella Buck vs Morgan Patterson / Natalie Hazen2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmanda Granger vs Monika Wynne4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Goorhouse / Jessica Murphy vs Jaime Oppenlander / Laurie Bos6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2021-10-30vs MVH Neubert FWL A18-4.5WWLost 01
L#1 DoublesRemington Gerst / Mary Muller vs Leah Hodges / Nancy Dancz1-6, 3-6
2021-10-23vs MY Brown FWL A18-4.5WWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAngela Goorhouse / Jessica Murphy vs Joan Hannadarrell / Marisa Brown4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Kienast / Mary Muller vs Ronda Stafford / Victoria Krievs6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WMI FWL A18&O 4.5 WW (5 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVH Neubert FWL A18-4.5WW5114412117
2PA Kienast FWL A18-4.5WW4210817151
3MY Brown FWL A18-4.5WW0631530191

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Mary Muller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Amanda Granger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.62
Julie Kienast
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.16
Jessica Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Remington Gerst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Muller + Julie Kienast271657% games+2.7% vs expected
Mary Muller + Remington Gerst134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Muller
122W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Amanda Granger
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Kienast
109W–88L career · 5 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
Jessica Murphy
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Remington Gerst
17W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.