Teams

CC Avila Rising Suns 7.0M

2025 USTA CC Summer Adult 65 & OVER · CC USTA 65 & OVER 7.0M

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-12vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Dickey 7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlie Gagnon / Marc Gronet vs Jim Dickey / Fred Mina6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStuart Marshall / Thomas Paine vs William Saiki / Frank Hood6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid DeMers / Larry Hecimovich vs David Gibson / David Johns2-6, 1-6
2025-10-05vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Dickey 7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesLukas Amler / Pete Biltoft vs Jim Dickey / David Gibson4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Munson / David DeMers vs Anthony Mendoza / Frank Hood3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLarry Hecimovich / Ronald Smith vs Fred Mina / William Saiki0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-28vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Dickey 7.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesPete Biltoft / Ronald Smith vs Jim Dickey / Bruce Davis2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLukas Amler / Larry Hecimovich vs David Gibson / David Johns0-6, 0-6
2025-09-21vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Dickey 7.0MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Ashley / Thomas Paine vs Bruce Davis / David Gibson3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRonald Smith / Pete Biltoft vs Frank Hood / Anthony Mendoza4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-17vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Dickey 7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharlie Gagnon / Marc Gronet vs Bruce Davis / William Saiki6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesThomas Munson / David Ashley vs David Gibson / David Johns1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLukas Amler / Pete Biltoft vs Anthony Mendoza / Frank Hood3-6, 2-6
2025-09-10vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Dickey 7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharlie Gagnon / David Ashley vs William Saiki / David Gibson4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Munson / Marc Gronet vs Anthony Mendoza / Frank Hood4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLukas Amler / David DeMers vs Jim Dickey / David Rennick1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-24vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Dickey 7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharlie Gagnon / Marc Gronet vs David Gibson / David Rennick6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Ashley / Thomas Paine vs Anthony Mendoza / Frank Hood6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRonald Smith / Pete Biltoft vs Fred Mina / David Johns6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-08-17vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Dickey 7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesStuart Marshall / Ronald Smith vs Anthony Mendoza / Frank Hood0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Paine / David Ashley vs Fred Mina / William Saiki6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLarry Hecimovich / Lukas Amler vs David Gibson / Bruce Davis0-6, 1-6
2025-08-10vs CC-LLW-Sinsheimer Dickey 7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesPete Biltoft / David DeMers vs Fred Mina / David Rennick0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharlie Gagnon / Marc Gronet vs Anthony Mendoza / Frank Hood3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Bailey / Thomas Munson vs William Saiki / Bruce Davis6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 65 & OVER 7.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Charlie Gagnon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Marc Gronet
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.26
David Ashley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Thomas Munson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Lukas Amler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.14
Pete Biltoft
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Thomas Paine
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
David DeMers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
Larry Hecimovich
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stuart Marshall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlie Gagnon + Marc Gronet1650% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Munson + Marc Gronet3351% gamesnot enough data
David DeMers + Larry Hecimovich1536% gamesnot enough data
Pete Biltoft + Lukas Amler1445% gamesnot enough data
David Ashley + Thomas Paine2343% gamesnot enough data
Pete Biltoft + Larry Hecimovich033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charlie Gagnon
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Marc Gronet
11W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
David Ashley
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Thomas Munson
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Lukas Amler
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Pete Biltoft
6W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Thomas Paine
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
David DeMers
7W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Larry Hecimovich
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Stuart Marshall
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.