Teams

WTC - Bitney 55 & Over TriLevel 4.0,3.5,3.0

2026 Dothan USTA Tri-Level 55 & Over · Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-04vs DO - CrowleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesMillie Armstrong / Vicki Bitney vs Martha Collins / Veleta Watson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Johnson / Carla Barnett vs Elizabeth Odom / Angie Mcdaniel4-6, 0-6
2026-08-04vs DO - CrowleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulia Johnson / Carla Barnett vs Jennifer Whittle / Jamie Shertzer0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Alford / Vicki Bitney vs Karan Barber / Karen Overstreet2-6, 4-6
2026-07-20vs DO - CrowleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesMillie Armstrong / Carla Barnett vs Veleta Watson / Amy Pruitt0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Johnson / Vicki Bitney vs Carie Crowley / Karen Overstreet2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DO - Crowley3090019
2WTC - Bitney 55 & Over TriLevel 4.0,3.5,3.0030918108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Lisa Howard
published
3.27
Millie Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Carla Barnett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Cathy Ogilvie
published 3
2.88
Caroline Alford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Vicki Bitney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Ogilvie + Vicki Bitney0720% games−14.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Howard
10W–14L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.31
Millie Armstrong
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
3.27
3.5
Carla Barnett
0W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Cathy Ogilvie
1W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Caroline Alford
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
Vicki Bitney
4W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.