Teams

Wise - PCC

2022 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-31vs Escambia - SimmonsWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Mitchem / Lori Gonzalez vs Lubomir Kaderjak / Lauren Haack6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeff Crigler / Susan Nitterauer vs Brad Bradford / Renee Bradford6-4, 6-1
2022-08-29vs Taylor - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Mitchem / Lori Gonzalez vs Hayden Essary / Debbie Wroten6-2, 6-3
2022-08-17vs Taylor - RS ClayLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Gonzalez / Buddy Gonzalez vs Wanda Taylor / Thomas Hackett6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJena Wise / Clay Pfeifler vs Debbie Wroten / Hayden Essary3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Crigler / Susan Nitterauer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-10vs Escambia - SimmonsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJena Wise / Clay Pfeifler vs Shelby Greene / Brad Bradford7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWilliam Mitchem / Lori Gonzalez vs William Morris / Jami Steinmetz6-4, 6-3
2022-07-27vs Taylor - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Crigler / Susan Nitterauer vs Hayden Essary / Arlene Doyle6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-20vs Escambia - SimmonsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesClay Pfeifler / Jena Wise vs Mansfield Coe / Shelby Greene7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeff Crigler / Susan Nitterauer vs Paul Einhart / Lauren Haack1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Lori Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.34
Carel Demanss
published 4.5
4.24
Michelle Covell
published
3.98
3.97
Susan Nitterauer
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.78
Jeff Crigler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Buddy Gonzalez
published 4
3.44
Jena Wise
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jena Wise + Jeff Crigler2740% games−10.9% vs expected
Michelle Covell + Jeff Crigler6260% gamesnot enough data
Susan Nitterauer + Jeff Crigler3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Gonzalez
128W–78L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Carel Demanss
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
4.34
Michelle Covell
92W–70L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Shaner Garner Crooke
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.98
Susan Nitterauer
149W–130L career · 6 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
Jeff Crigler
29W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
96%4%<1%
3.78
4
Buddy Gonzalez
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Jena Wise
38W–96L career · 6 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.