Teams

Li.Ihly55M

2025 Capital Mixed 55 & Over · 9.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Allison Ostrander
published 4.5
4.07
Jeanne Bauer
published 4.5
3.95
Kana Brinckerhoff
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.94
Lisa Ihly
published 4.5
3.87
Michael Hamlett
published
Kurt Ihly
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Ihly + Kurt Ihly1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Ostrander
301W–150L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
4.12
4.5
Jeanne Bauer
111W–107L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
4
Kana Brinckerhoff
238W–110L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4.5
Lisa Ihly
121W–106L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
Michael Hamlett
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Kurt Ihly
65W–35L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.