Teams

HHTL70/Kenworthy/Spring Lake

Adult 70 & Over - SC · Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-06vs HHTL (A) 3.5W 70 & Over (Williams)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMaryKay Moore / Patricia Priestley vs Pat Giuliani / Gail Bisbee0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Lauderdale / Gay Reichel vs Gigi Kotler / Suzanne Sears5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPat Kenworthy / Stephanie Rathan vs Janice Sullivan / Carol Zack4-6, 3-6
2026-03-31vs BBTL70/Taylor/SunCityLost 01
L#2 DoublesJudith Ferguson / Charlene Miller vs Betty Sousa / Jody Winer4-6, 1-6
2026-03-30vs HHTL70/McKinley/Spring LakeWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaryKay Moore / Gay Reichel vs Mary Howe / Nancy Warner6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Applegate / Maureen Riley vs Sherry Calise / Sharon Geiman5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPat Kenworthy / Bonnie Totman vs Lois McKinley / Susan Boggs7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-24vs BBTL70/McGaughan/Sun CityWon 10
W#2 DoublesJudith Ferguson / Jan Horan vs Donna Lucas / Lydia Costa6-1, 6-2
2026-03-23vs HHTL70/Colquitt/Spring LakeLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusie McLaughlin / Patricia Priestley vs Sheala Browning / Honey Honymar4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeverly Lauderdale / Gay Reichel vs Jan Harris / Maria Tomisaka7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Ferguson / Carla Wimmer vs Deborah McGee / Barbara Thompson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-21vs HHTL70/Sowers/Spanish WellsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudith Ferguson / Carla Wimmer vs Julie Lawson / Pamela Kurtz0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Priestley / Susie McLaughlin vs Ashild Athanas / Sherry Adams6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaureen Riley / Patty Zensinger vs Carol Mehrling / Lila Mellen4-6, 4-6
2026-03-09vs HHTL70/Blake/Spring LakeLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Applegate / Susie McLaughlin vs Charlotte Cornell / Jeanette Payne2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMaryKay Moore / Gay Reichel vs Joan Cooper / Jane Janiak7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Rathan / Bonnie Totman vs Sue Lievense / Julie Scovel2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-24vs BBTL70/PfefferSchmitt/DatawWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Cornell / Judith Ferguson vs Karen McCue / Judy Sevigny7-5, 6-4
2026-02-23vs HHTL70/Calcagni/Long CoveWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudith Ferguson / Carla Wimmer vs Joyce Hollis / Karen Tedder6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBeverly Lauderdale / Stephanie Rathan vs Tevis Kraft / Cindy Green6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPat Kenworthy / Patty Zensinger vs Elaine Killoran / Claire Strouse4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Susie McLaughlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Judith Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Maureen Riley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Carla Wimmer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Stephanie Rathan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Bonnie Totman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Beverly Lauderdale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
MaryKay Moore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Patty Zensinger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Pat Kenworthy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Gay Reichel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Patricia Priestley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Linda Applegate
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kathy Freer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Applegate + Maureen Riley5259% games+6.7% vs expected
Carla Wimmer + Maureen Riley19563% games+6.1% vs expected
MaryKay Moore + Gay Reichel14163% games+3.4% vs expected
Linda Applegate + Patricia Priestley7457% games+1.3% vs expected
Beverly Lauderdale + Patricia Priestley6256% games−1.0% vs expected
Pat Kenworthy + Patricia Priestley4357% gamesnot enough data
Carla Wimmer + Judith Ferguson4160% gamesnot enough data
Linda Applegate + Bonnie Totman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susie McLaughlin
25W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Judith Ferguson
41W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Maureen Riley
50W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Carla Wimmer
43W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Stephanie Rathan
37W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Bonnie Totman
14W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Beverly Lauderdale
39W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
MaryKay Moore
54W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Patty Zensinger
28W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Pat Kenworthy
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Gay Reichel
46W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Patricia Priestley
44W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Linda Applegate
36W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
Kathy Freer
15W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.