Teams

Team 1 Courtmasters

2024 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over · NOVA Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.30 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-09-11vs Team 8 Stringing WinnersWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Kalfus / Scott Washow vs Anh-Tuan Le / Thuy Nguyen6-4, 6-3
2024-08-28vs Team 6 Z's Last Chance SaloonWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Washow / Robert Kalfus vs Ardavan Mesbahi / Walker Cross5-7, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Joseph Awadalla
published
4.33
Vijeaswaran Velusamy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.26
Damani Eubanks
published 4.5
4.18
Robert Kalfus
published
4.12
Scott Washow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Geo Nikolov
published
3.82
Mike Metzger
published
3.76
Marvin Martinez
published
3.72
Vijay Kalanadhabhatta
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Kenzell Crawford
published
3.66
Jeff Rosenblum
published
3.61
Andrew Wanamaker
published 4
3.39
Kevin Chiong
published
Jorge Prieto Choy
published
Justin Lee
published
Kevin Tindle
published
Kursat Yavuz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Chiong + Marvin Martinez303 matchesnot enough data
Damani Eubanks + Joseph Awadalla213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Awadalla
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Vijeaswaran Velusamy
205W–79L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.33
4.5
Damani Eubanks
19W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.26
Robert Kalfus
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Scott Washow
112W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
Geo Nikolov
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.99
Mike Metzger
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Marvin Martinez
21W–30L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Vijay Kalanadhabhatta
105W–75L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.72
Kenzell Crawford
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Jeff Rosenblum
40W–31L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Andrew Wanamaker
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.61
Kevin Chiong
9W–21L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
3.39
Jorge Prieto Choy
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Justin Lee
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Tindle
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kursat Yavuz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.