Teams

Cloar/LR/Reb

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0,3.5,4.0 · 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-07vs Ross/Bryant/LR/RebWon 32
W#1 DoublesLori Shepard / Tracy Webb vs Sara Bryant / Sara Koger6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKaitlyn Witherell vs Roz Taylor6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Rech / Christa Clark vs Abbey Hornbeck / Amy Ross6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesErin McNully vs Lanie Driver3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMimi Lee / Holly Larkin vs Holly Driver / Karla Karwoski6-3, 6-1
2025-04-21vs Allison/Buck/LR/OCWon 32
W#1 DoublesMimi Lee / Erin McNully vs Katie Rutledge / Lisa Moreland4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHolly Larkin vs Laura Feng0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChrista Clark / Melanie Lyons vs Melissa Buck / Brenda Green5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKaitlyn Witherell vs Tiffanie Taylor6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTracy Webb / Jennifer Morrison vs Kisha Boston / Debra Wayne6-0, 7-5
2025-04-09vs Allison/Buck/LR/OCWon 32
W#1 DoublesMimi Lee / Erin McNully vs Libby Atkinson / Pamela Curtis6-4, 5-4
W#1 SinglesKaitlyn Witherell vs Susan Allison7-5, 5-3
L#2 DoublesLeslie Cloar / Anita Mason vs Brenda Green / Katie Rutledge6-7, 3-5
L#2 SinglesChrista Clark vs Laura Feng2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHolly Larkin / Tina Sikes vs Leslie Warford / Kisha Boston6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Ross/Bryant/LR/RebLost 23
W#1 DoublesLori Shepard / Anita Mason vs Holly Driver / Constance Lovelace6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesErin McNully vs Traci Bishop Kiernan5-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesLeslie Cloar / Kaitlyn Witherell vs Lanie Driver / Amy Ross6-7, 1-3
L#2 SinglesSarah Rech vs Roz Taylor2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTina Sikes / Jennifer Morrison vs Sara Bryant / Sara Koger5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-12vs Schillcutt/Jacksonville/BPWon 41
W#1 DoublesChrista Clark / Jennifer Morrison vs Caroline Dominick / Jessica Caple7-6, 3-3
L#1 SinglesKaitlyn Witherell vs Robbie Ward5-7, 0-3
W#2 DoublesHolly Larkin / Sarah Rech vs Torie Russell / Katie Terrell6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLeslie Cloar vs Evans Lee6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMimi Lee / Anita Mason vs Abbey Laureano / Alexandra Pagoni7-5, 6-1
2025-02-24vs Harkins/Wilson/LR/RebWon 31
W#1 DoublesErin McNully / Crystal Phelps vs Kristen Bailey / Amy Harkins6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKaitlyn Witherell vs Caroline Thomas6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesTracy Webb / Lori Shepard vs Julie Jefferson / Molly Bradney6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChrista Clark / Mimi Lee vs Jillian Wilson / Kate Lachowsky-Khan6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Kaitlyn Witherell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.11
Anita Mason
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.07
Tracy Webb
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Leslie Cloar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.82
Melanie Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Mimi Lee
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
Erin McNully
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.77
Holly Larkin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Lori Shepard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Crystal Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Christa Clark
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.65
Tina Sikes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Jennifer Morrison
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sarah Rech
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mimi Lee + Anita Mason10459% games−0.3% vs expected
Melanie Lyons + Christa Clark2447% games−3.9% vs expected
Lori Shepard + Tracy Webb314 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Cloar + Anita Mason314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kaitlyn Witherell
41W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
3
Anita Mason
37W–22L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Tracy Webb
22W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Leslie Cloar
18W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
Melanie Lyons
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Mimi Lee
22W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Erin McNully
13W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Holly Larkin
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Lori Shepard
22W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Crystal Phelps
7W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Christa Clark
11W–29L career · 9 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Tina Sikes
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Jennifer Morrison
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Sarah Rech
9W–22L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.