Teams

GSCC RED

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-29vs BASALT BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Kaufman / Katherine Proctor vs Nancy Garrigus / Lauren Mirich6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi McCullough / Desiree Palomares vs Katie Ralston / Audrey Allen0-6, 0-6
2025-09-22vs GSCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 SinglesDesiree Palomares vs Erin Evers2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesGrace Wright / Katherine Proctor vs Ana Lucia Aguirre Sinagawa / Bailey Mccallister6-4, 6-0
2025-09-17vs BASALT BLACKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDaniele Burns / Kate Dehm vs Nancy Garrigus / Katie Ralston6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKatherine Proctor / Desiree Palomares vs Audrey Allen / Ginger Opp2-6, 4-6
2025-09-15vs GSCC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatherine Proctor / Grace Wright vs Rachael Degraffenried / Molly Hamilton6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDaniele Burns / Kate Dehm vs Silvia Barajas / Yarely Pavon6-2, 6-0
2025-09-10vs GSCC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesKate Dehm / Julie Kaufman vs Erin Evers / Molly Hamilton3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDaniele Burns vs Rachael Degraffenried6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeidi McCullough / Desiree Palomares vs Ana Lucia Aguirre Sinagawa / Bailey Mccallister6-1, 6-4
2025-09-04vs BASALT BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristin Davis / Grace Wright vs Lauren Mirich / Nancy Garrigus1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHeidi McCullough vs Katie Fitzgerald2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKate Dehm / Katherine Proctor vs Jessie Hjorth / Desiree Pimentel6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Grace Wright
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Kate Dehm
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Daniele Burns
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Desiree Palomares
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.14
Katherine Proctor
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.09
Heidi McCullough
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Grace Wright + Katherine Proctor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Grace Wright
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
Kate Dehm
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Daniele Burns
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Desiree Palomares
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Proctor
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Heidi McCullough
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.