Teams

UPTA55C/Nichols/GCC

2023 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.71 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 55+ Combo Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Turrentine
published 4
3.56
Liliana McGee
published
3.54
Harriet Gray
published 4
3.48
Cindy Cannon
published 3.5
3.48
Beth Nichols
published 4
3.35
Catherine Dugas
published 3.5
3.26
Carol Farnsworth
published 3.5
3.25
Margaret Boliek
published
3.21
Lisa Mann
published
3.20
Danette Kabas
published 3.5
3.05
Lauren Demosthenes
published
Joan Herlong
published
Kathy Cottingham
published
Kristin Ivester
published
Lisa Ashmore
published
Lorye Boukedes
published
Melissa Thomason
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Dugas + Margaret Boliek4358% games+1.1% vs expected
Lisa Mann + Margaret Boliek314 matchesnot enough data
Danette Kabas + Cindy Cannon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Turrentine
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Liliana McGee
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Harriet Gray
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cindy Cannon
14W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
4
Beth Nichols
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Catherine Dugas
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Carol Farnsworth
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
Margaret Boliek
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Lisa Mann
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Danette Kabas
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Lauren Demosthenes
22W–31L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Joan Herlong
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Cottingham
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin Ivester
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Ashmore
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lorye Boukedes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Thomason
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.