Teams

Baker 3.5 18 Spring

2026 Decatur Spring Adult 18 and Over 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-28vs Lamar 3.5 18 SpringWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Devine / Perry Baker vs Chuck Lamar / Michael Gibson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJosh Wisener / Richard Mukadam vs Joey Rushing / Christopher Proctor2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-19vs Lamar 3.5 18 SpringWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Devine / Akshay Singh vs Allen Hines / Chuck Lamar4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTucker Fleming / Dewayne Maze vs Michael Gibson / Christopher Proctor6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesZach Ingrum / Derek Epp vs Eugene Acupan / Joseph Montgomery2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-15vs Lamar 3.5 18 SpringLost 12
W#1 DoublesTucker Fleming / Andrew Devine vs Eugene Acupan / Allen Hines6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEugene McNutt / Perry Baker vs Michael Gibson / Newell Johnson5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesZach Ingrum / Derek Epp vs Christopher Proctor / Joey Rushing6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2026-03-15vs Lamar 3.5 18 SpringWon 21
W#1 DoublesJosh Wisener / Akshay Singh vs Chuck Lamar / Michael Gibson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTimothy Nave / Dewayne Maze vs Joey Rushing / Joseph Montgomery7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRichard Mukadam / Zach Ingrum vs Newell Johnson / Vu Pham2-6, 1-6
2026-03-15vs Lamar 3.5 18 SpringWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Devine / Tucker Fleming vs Allen Hines / RAUNAQ BAJAJ7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesZach Ingrum / Derek Epp vs Jason Seale / Joseph Montgomery6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJosh Wisener / Dewayne Maze vs Christopher Proctor / Michael Gibson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-14vs Lamar 3.5 18 SpringWon 21
W#1 DoublesPerry Baker / Tucker Fleming vs Chuck Lamar / Ben Donahue6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJosh Wisener / Kip Potter vs Michael Gibson / Allen Hines7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDerek Epp / Richard Mukadam vs Christopher Proctor / Joey Rushing6-2, 6-4
2026-03-05vs Lamar 3.5 18 SpringLost 12
L#1 DoublesJosh Wisener / Andrew Devine vs Newell Johnson / Vu Pham1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRishi Patel / Dewayne Maze vs Michael Gibson / RAUNAQ BAJAJ6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDerek Epp / Richard Mukadam vs Joseph Montgomery / Jason Seale1-6, 2-6
2026-02-21vs Lamar 3.5 18 SpringSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Devine / Eugene McNutt vs Ben Donahue / Allen Hines6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesZach Ingrum / Timothy Nave vs Christopher Proctor / Jason Seale2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Baker 3.5 18 Spring62141024205
2Lamar 3.5 18 Spring2691533235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Tucker Fleming
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Perry Baker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Andrew Devine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Josh Wisener
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.19
Kip Potter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Eugene McNutt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Rishi Patel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Akshay Singh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Richard Mukadam
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Derek Epp
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.98
Dewayne Maze
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Zach Ingrum
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.81
Timothy Nave
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Nave + Zach Ingrum134 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Nave + Dewayne Maze213 matchesnot enough data
Perry Baker + Andrew Devine123 matchesnot enough data
Derek Epp + Zach Ingrum033 matchesnot enough data
Zach Ingrum + Andrew Devine123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tucker Fleming
17W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.67
Perry Baker
22W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Andrew Devine
36W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Josh Wisener
26W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Kip Potter
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Eugene McNutt
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
Rishi Patel
23W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.17
3.5
Akshay Singh
6W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Richard Mukadam
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Derek Epp
37W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Dewayne Maze
30W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
2.98
Zach Ingrum
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89
Timothy Nave
29W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.