Teams

ACAC Carter

2024 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-15vs ACAC Delisio Destruction CrewWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeff Bosch / Anant Singh vs Michael Blackburn / Tim Kasten6-0, 7-6
2024-09-08vs MAC PettitWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Bosch / Randolph Moore vs Jeff Kane / Tom Rider6-3, 6-3
2024-08-31vs Westwood- Mullahy ThunderstruckWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Bosch / Craig Carman vs Sean DiBlasi / Mike Whitaker6-4, 7-6
2024-08-25vs Avalon GhitaLost 01
L#3 DoublesBert Teachey / Mark Carter vs Ayush Gandhi / Vikram Nagulan1-6, 1-6
2024-08-17vs CCV Murphy/ParkerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Carman / Bert Teachey vs Whitson Huffman / Matthew Wherry3-6, 2-6
2024-08-10vs Wyndham - HouffLost 02
L#1 DoublesBert Teachey / Jeffrey Foddrell vs Brian Zollinhofer / Bert Foreman3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Bosch / Ed Shropshire vs Bhargavaram Kallam / Manmeet Mahajan2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBert Teachey / Ryan Traylor vs Andy Tucker / Ryan Gibson0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-28vs MAC 7.5 Stephens ResurgenceLost 02
L#1 DoublesBert Teachey / Ryan Traylor vs Greg Deeb / Jonathan McDorman4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Bosch / Jeffrey Foddrell vs Jeff Richman / Kevin Cousins3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Jeff Bosch
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.73
Bert Teachey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Ryan Traylor
published
3.38
Paul Davis
published
3.35
Anant Singh
published 3.5
3.32
Jeffrey Foddrell
published
3.32
Stone Smith
published
3.24
Craig Carman
published 3.5
3.22
Randolph Moore
published
3.19
Ed Shropshire
published
Mark Carter
published
Steven Larue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randolph Moore + Stone Smith81050% games−4.9% vs expected
Anant Singh + Stone Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Bosch + Bert Teachey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeff Bosch
205W–176L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Bert Teachey
119W–143L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Ryan Traylor
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.67
Paul Davis
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Anant Singh
32W–31L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Jeffrey Foddrell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Stone Smith
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Craig Carman
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Randolph Moore
22W–24L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Ed Shropshire
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Mark Carter
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Larue
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.