Teams

Junior/LR/OC

2024 Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Ellie Karvoski
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.31
Elizabeth Jara
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.23
Autumn Hemphill
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Anita Junior
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Angele Forrest
published 3
2.85
Susan Allison
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ellie Karvoski
25W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%3%
3.75
Elizabeth Jara
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Autumn Hemphill
20W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Anita Junior
30W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3
Angele Forrest
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
Susan Allison
35W–33L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.