← Teams

CRRC-Ash

2020 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Nick Hooker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
—
Christian Paulsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Jane Paulsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Ryan Owens
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Robert Glenn
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.82
Erik Bucher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Carol Glenn
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Karin Owens
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Michelle Ellett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2020-03-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs William Maddox / Claire C Gates6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNicola Ash / Christian Paulsen vs Michael Jakola / Sue Piazza6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesErik Bucher / Michelle Ellett vs Charles Martin / Holly Martin6-2, 6-4
2020-02-22Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker / Nicola Ash vs John Anderson / Claire C Gates6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRonald Skoletsky / Jane Paulsen vs William Maddox / Meg Anderson7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesErik Bucher / Karin Owens vs Charles Martin / Holly Martin6-3, 6-0
2020-02-14Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesNick Hooker / Nicola Ash vs Brad Johnson / Diane Nelson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Matt Savage / Leah Black6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRyan Owens / Michelle Ellett vs Rodrigo Martinez / Virginia Martinez2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2020-01-31Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Wes Milligan / Jacqueline Babb Milligan1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristian Paulsen / Karin Owens vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Fred Sutardjo7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Owens / Michelle Ellett vs Evelyne Cassell / Vikas Rao6-1, 6-4
2020-01-24Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Carol Glenn vs Vasilios Garyfallou / Heidi Nevin6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristian Paulsen / Jane Paulsen vs Fred Leonetti / Ellen Wood6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRonald Skoletsky / Karin Owens vs William Roberts / Barbara Gram6-3, 6-3
2020-01-17Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Nick Hooker vs Marty Fraser / Matthew Majewski6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJane Paulsen / Christian Paulsen vs Allison Bader / Eli Lamb7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErik Bucher / Karin Owens vs Beverly Placko / Kerry Sweet6-3, 6-2
2020-01-12Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesCarol Glenn / Robert Glenn vs Darryl Walters / Rebecca Walters7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRyan Owens / Jane Paulsen vs Susan Bradley / Lew Woods7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nick Hooker
194W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.82
3.5
Christian Paulsen
112W–67L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jane Paulsen
84W–62L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Ryan Owens
113W–77L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
14%86%0%
3.07
3
Erik Bucher
79W–60L career
0%98%1%
2.82
3
Carol Glenn
82W–81L career
0%99%1%
2.79
3
Karin Owens
82W–66L career
1%99%0%
2.77
3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74
3
Michelle Ellett
41W–39L career
21%79%0%
2.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.