Teams

KY/LOU/WINEBRENNER

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & Over LOUISVILLE · 3.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-08vs KY/LOU/HAMILTONWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren George / Michelle Winebrenner vs Deanna Gordinier / Wendy Ohlson1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGretchen Martin / Mary Helen Davis vs Jeanne Coffey / Kim DeVries6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTheresa Neichter / Mary Beth Meagher vs Beverly Lewis / Kathryn Carter4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-02-27vs KY/LOU/HAMILTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Spalding / Karen Heintz vs Amy Reynolds / Kim DeVries7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoyce Blackman / Mary Beth Meagher vs Deanna Gordinier / Jeanne Coffey7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJane Sharon / Stephanie Kellerman vs Melissa Weidman / Elizabeth Torp6-4, 6-3
2026-02-22vs KY/LOU/BARONWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Jones / Joyce Blackman vs Laura Pierce / Brenda Richardson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesConnie Hayes / Michelle Winebrenner vs Karen Quinkert / Fran Ferrell6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Heintz / Mary Beth Meagher vs Gina Milliner / Teresa Sermersheim7-6, 6-3
2026-02-13vs KY/LOU/HAMILTONWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Jones / Janet Kanzinger vs Kim DeVries / Maryjanice Beavin6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStephanie Kellerman / Debra Sanford vs Jeanne Coffey / Elizabeth Torp6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChandler Milton / Michelle Winebrenner vs Elisabeth Gray / Patrice Stevens6-0, 7-6
2026-01-31vs KY/LOU/BARONWon 21
W#1 DoublesJane Sharon / Nancy Jones vs Kathy Klein / Donna Wendell5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChandler Milton / Janet Kanzinger vs Laura Pierce / Karen Quinkert7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNatoshia Goepfrich / Cathy Wheeler vs Teresa Sermersheim / Lisa Marsh6-2, 6-3
2026-01-11vs KY/LOU/BARONWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoyce Blackman / Janet Kanzinger vs Kathy Klein / Amy Lampton6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJane Sharon / Nancy Jones vs Mary Baron / Yrleen Stuecker6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStephanie Kellerman / Cathy Wheeler vs Patricia Dye / Fran Ferrell6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Joyce Blackman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Michelle Winebrenner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.94
Connie Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Jane Sharon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Cathy Wheeler
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Mary Beth Meagher
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
Janet Kanzinger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Chandler Milton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Stephanie Kellerman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Debra Sanford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Theresa Neichter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Natoshia Goepfrich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Rhonda Chesser
published
Gretchen Martin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen George
published
Karen Heintz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Helen Davis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Spalding
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Kanzinger + Joyce Blackman404 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Kellerman + Michelle Winebrenner123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Winebrenner + Jane Sharon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joyce Blackman
8W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Michelle Winebrenner
26W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Connie Hayes
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Jane Sharon
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Cathy Wheeler
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Mary Beth Meagher
19W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Janet Kanzinger
12W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Chandler Milton
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Kellerman
21W–30L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Debra Sanford
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Theresa Neichter
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Natoshia Goepfrich
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Rhonda Chesser
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Gretchen Martin
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Karen George
31W–45L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Heintz
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Helen Davis
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Susan Spalding
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.