Teams

Binghamton

Women's Inter-region League · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-08vs SyracuseWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Burns / Diane Coe vs Rajani Day / Ping Deng6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGina Callahan / Tara Kaminsky vs Heather Vallet / Karen Snyder6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMaureen Hankin / Danielle Evan vs MaryEllen Jordan / Valerie Clarke4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-11-01vs RochesterWon 21
W#1 DoublesJENNIFER WEGMANN / Gina Callahan vs Joan Aiello / Yulia Nedelko4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJuliet Concilla / Mary Cawley-Oliver vs Luanne Reinis / Elena Hollands4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Paulsen / Danielle Evan vs Calli Barry / Jun Ma6-3, 6-3
2025-10-18vs SyracuseWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Burns / Diane Coe vs Andrea Elliott / MaryEllen Jordan6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJuliet Concilla / Mary Cawley-Oliver vs Heather Vallet / Karen Snyder1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJanet Cady / Laurie Holdridge vs Karlene Pascarella / Gyeonghye Shin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-04vs RochesterWon 30
W#1 DoublesSue Burns / Diane Coe vs Yulia Nedelko / Amanda Spencer6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanet Cady / Gina Callahan vs Joan Aiello / Hannah Huang7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDanielle Evan / Amy Paulsen vs Jun Ma / Tutrinh Tran6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Binghamton4093897
2Rochester226614107
3Syracuse043919126

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Diane Coe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
JENNIFER WEGMANN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Tara Kaminsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Sue Burns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Juliet Concilla
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Danielle Evan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Janet Cady
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Amy Paulsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Gina Callahan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Laurie Holdridge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Cawley-Oliver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Hankin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Coe + Sue Burns7064% games+10.1% vs expected
Gina Callahan + JENNIFER WEGMANN6649% games+4.8% vs expected
Tara Kaminsky + Gina Callahan51042% games−2.2% vs expected
Juliet Concilla + Mary Cawley-Oliver1638% gamesnot enough data
Tara Kaminsky + JENNIFER WEGMANN2354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Diane Coe
16W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
JENNIFER WEGMANN
15W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Tara Kaminsky
40W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Sue Burns
113W–92L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
3
Juliet Concilla
116W–131L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Danielle Evan
11W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Janet Cady
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.87
3
Amy Paulsen
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gina Callahan
27W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
Laurie Holdridge
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Cawley-Oliver
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maureen Hankin
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.