Teams

Helsper/HCP/Foothills

2026 Foothills Spring 55 & Over League · Women 3.5 - Saturday Morning

13 players · average NTRP 3.45 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-25vs Skoog/LHCC/FoothillsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCourtney Haan / Lisa Boller vs Rosemary Skoog / Chery Cunningham Poston6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElise Wright / Kelly Emoff vs Wendy Walker / Rosa Szalanski6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMarsha Phillips / Cori Thompson vs Marsha Diamonti / Sandi Horyza1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-04-18vs Skoog/LHCC/FoothillsWon 30
W#1 DoublesGretchen Myers / Nancy James vs Rosemary Skoog / Rosa Szalanski7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarson Helsper / Susan Knowles vs Tracy Brown / Theresa Huggins6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJill Sullivan-Keating / Kelly Emoff vs Marsha Diamonti / Sandi Horyza6-3, 6-0
2026-04-11vs Skoog/LHCC/FoothillsWon 30
W#1 DoublesGretchen Myers / Nancy James vs Jackie Finley / Karen Hurst6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCourtney Haan / Elise Wright vs Wendy Walker / Tracy Brown7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill Sullivan-Keating / Cori Thompson vs Marsha Diamonti / Rosa Szalanski4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Skoog/LHCC/FoothillsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCourtney Haan / Lisa Boller vs Rosemary Skoog / Heather Hancock7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElise Wright / Kelly Emoff vs Marsha Diamonti / Jackie Finley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarsha Phillips / Susan Knowles vs Elaine Myers / Tracy Brown3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-21vs Skoog/LHCC/FoothillsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy James / Mitzi Story vs Marsha Diamonti / Wendy Walker6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGretchen Myers / Cori Thompson vs Rosa Szalanski / Rosemary Skoog5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Boller / Margie Henry vs Karen Hurst / Theresa Huggins7-5, 6-2
2026-03-14vs Skoog/LHCC/FoothillsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarson Helsper / Gretchen Myers vs Elaine Myers / Jackie Finley6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJill Sullivan-Keating / Susan Knowles vs Chery Cunningham Poston / Heather Hancock7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMargie Henry / Nancy James vs Marsha Diamonti / Tracy Brown6-3, 6-4
2026-03-07vs Skoog/LHCC/FoothillsWon 21
W#1 DoublesGretchen Myers / Lisa Boller vs Karen Hurst / Elaine Myers6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCori Thompson / Kelly Emoff vs Rosemary Skoog / Chery Cunningham Poston1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarson Helsper / Elise Wright vs Wendy Walker / Sandi Horyza6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - Saturday Morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Gretchen Myers
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.46
Mitzi Story
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.45
Carson Helsper
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Jill Sullivan-Keating
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Courtney Haan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Elise Wright
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Lisa Boller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Kelly Emoff
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Margie Henry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Marsha Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.09
Cori Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Susan Knowles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy James
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Haan + Mitzi Story7265% games+15.0% vs expected
Courtney Haan + Lisa Boller4257% games+9.3% vs expected
Susan Knowles + Marsha Phillips4262% gamesnot enough data
Carson Helsper + Courtney Haan5152% gamesnot enough data
Carson Helsper + Lisa Boller303 matchesnot enough data
Marsha Phillips + Jill Sullivan-Keating213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gretchen Myers
10W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Mitzi Story
72W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Carson Helsper
144W–110L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Jill Sullivan-Keating
134W–69L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Courtney Haan
132W–112L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Elise Wright
14W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Lisa Boller
74W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Kelly Emoff
62W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Margie Henry
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Marsha Phillips
108W–74L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Cori Thompson
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Susan Knowles
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Nancy James
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.