Teams

SpringPark/Nolen W2.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A W2.5 WINTER LEAGUE - Sunday

12 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-23vs RGAC Red/J. Molina W2.5SWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Hager / Ellen Braht vs Angela Smith / Christina Jones6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Rao / Elaine Luce vs Erin Conton / Luzadriana Giannini6-1, 6-2
2025-02-16vs RGAC Red/J. Molina W2.5SWon 30
W#1 DoublesSeema Rao / Ellen Braht vs Heather Hale / Jessica Jimenez6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKelly Hager vs Erin Conton6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElaine Luce / Rebecca Crabtree vs Angela Smith / Nicole Dauksavage6-1, 6-2
2025-02-04vs RGAC Red/J. Molina W2.5SWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobyn Lilly / Elaine Luce vs Melissa Pearson / Lydianne Padron McDonald3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKelly Hager vs Annette Rice6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Choate / Jackie Orr vs Heather Hale / Christina Jones7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A W2.5 WINTER LEAGUE - Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Kelly Hager
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Elaine Luce
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ellen Braht
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jackie Orr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Rao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Choate
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mischelle Raftery
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Pilar Chamison
published
Rebecca Crabtree
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robyn Lilly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Seema Rao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Teri Jones
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Lilly + Kelly Rao0534% gamesnot enough data
Teri Jones + Ellen Braht2347% gamesnot enough data
Robyn Lilly + Elaine Luce224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Rao + Elaine Luce224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Hager
36W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Elaine Luce
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Ellen Braht
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jackie Orr
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Rao
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Choate
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mischelle Raftery
0W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pilar Chamison
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Crabtree
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robyn Lilly
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Seema Rao
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Teri Jones
3W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.